The CA Foundation January 2027 exam is approaching, and revising important Business Laws questions can help you make better use of your remaining preparation time. Focus on key legal provisions, their practical applications and the way answers are presented in the exam.
To help you prepare for the January 2027 CA Foundation exam, PW provides dedicated CA batches, live and recorded classes, study notes, previous-year questions (PYQs), question practice and other learning resources. Practising important Business Laws questions alongside these resources can help you revise key concepts, identify areas that need more attention and become familiar with different question formats.
Practising important questions with answers can help you understand how legal provisions are tested through direct theory questions and practical case-based scenarios. The following questions cover important concepts in Business Laws.
1. "The Indian Partnership Act does not make the registration of a firm compulsory, nor does it impose any penalty for non- registration." In light of the given statement, discuss the consequences of non-registration of partnership firms in India. Also, explain the rights unaffected due to non-registration of firms.
Sol. It is true to say that Indian Partnership Act, 1932 does not make the registration of firms compulsory nor does it impose any penalty for non-registration.
Following are the consequences of Non-registration of Partnership Firms in India:
The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 does not make the registration of firms compulsory nor does it impose any penalty for non-registration. However, under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, non-registration of partnership gives rise to a number of disabilities. These disabilities briefly are as follows:
(i) No suit in a civil court by firm or other co-partners against third party: The firm or any other person on its behalf cannot bring an action against the third party for breach of contract entered into by the firm, unless the firm is registered and the persons suing are or have been shown in the register of firms as partners in the firm.
(ii) No relief to partners for set-off of claim: If an action is brought against the firm by a third party, then neither the firm nor the partner can claim any set-off, if the suit be valued for more than ₹100 or pursue other proceedings to enforce the rights arising from any contract.
(iii) Aggrieved partner cannot bring legal action against other partner or the firm: A partner of an unregistered firm (or any other person on his behalf) is precluded from bringing legal action against the firm or any person alleged to be or to have been a partner in the firm. But, such a person may sue for dissolution of the firm or for accounts and realization of his share in the firm’s property where the firm is dissolved.
(iv) Third party can sue the firm: In case of an unregistered firm, an action can be brought against the firm by a third party.
Following are the Rights unaffected due to non-registration of firms: Non- registration of a firm does not, however, affect the following rights:
1. The right of third parties to sue the firm or any partner.
2. The right of partners to sue for the dissolution of the firm or for the settlement of the accounts of a dissolved firm, or for realization of the property of a dissolved firm.
3. The power of an Official Assignees, Receiver of Court to release the property of the insolvent partner and to bring an action.
4. The right to sue or claim a set-off if the value of suit does not exceed ₹ 100 in value.
5. The right to suit and proceeding instituted by legal representatives or heirs of the deceased partner of a firm for accounts of the firm or to realise the property of the firm.
Sol. Effects of insolvency of a partner (Section 34 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932):
(i) The insolvent partner cannot be continued as a partner.
(ii) He will be ceased to be a partner from the very date on which the order of adjudication is made.
(iii) The estate of the insolvent partner is not liable for the acts of the firm done after the date of order of adjudication.
(iv) The firm is also not liable for any act of the insolvent partner after the date of the order of adjudication,
(v) Ordinarily, the insolvency of a partner results in dissolution of a firm; but the partners are competent to agree among themselves that the adjudication of a partner as an insolvent will not give rise to dissolution of the firm.
Sol. According to Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, "Partnership" is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all. Therefore, for determining the existence of partnership, it must be proved.
1. There must be an agreement between all the persons concerned;
2. The agreement must be to carry on some business;
3. The agreement must be to share the profits of a business and
4. The business was carried on by all or any of them acting for all.
On the basis of above provisons and facts provided in the question, Mr. Ram and Mr. Raheem cannot be said under partnership as they are teachers in a school and just purchased a flat jointly. By merely giving the flat on rent, they are not doing business. They are just earning the income from the property under their co-ownership. Hence, there is no partnership between them. Therefore, Mr. Ram is liable to pay his share only i.e. ₹ 1500. Mr. John has to claim rest ₹ 1500 from Mr. Raheem.
Sol. Section 29 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 provides that a share in a partnership is transferable like any other property, but as the partnership relationship is based on mutual confidence, the assignee of a partner’s interest by sale, mortgage or otherwise cannot enjoy the same rights and privileges as the original partner.
The rights of such a transferee are as follows:
(1) During the continuance of partnership, such transferee is not entitled
(a) to interfere with the conduct of the business,
(b) to require accounts, or
(c) to inspect books of the firm.
He is only entitled to receive the share of the profits of the transferring partner and he is bound to accept the profits as agreed to by the partners, i.e., he cannot challenge the accounts.
(2) On the dissolution of the firm or on the retirement of the transferring partner, the transferee will be entitled, against the remaining partners:
(a) to receive the share of the assets of the firm to which the transferring partner was entitled, and
(b) for the purpose of ascertaining the share,
he is entitled to an account as from the date of the dissolution.
By virtue of Section 31, no person can be introduced as a partner in a firm without the consent of all the partners. A partner cannot by transferring his own interest, make anybody else a partner in his place, unless the other partners agree to accept that person as a partner. At the same time, a partner is not debarred from transferring his interest. A partner’s interest in the partnership can be regarded as an existing interest and tangible property which can be assigned.
You can use the CA Foundation Business Laws Important Questions PDF to practise additional questions and revise important legal provisions from different chapters. Keep the PDF handy during revision to revisit questions, check your understanding and practise writing answers.
Study without using the internet
Preparing for Business Laws requires regular revision and question practice. Use the following resources to cover the syllabus and practise different types of questions.
CA Foundation Business Laws Syllabus:
Review the prescribed syllabus and divide the chapters into smaller topics. Make sure you cover all the applicable laws and provisions.
CA Foundation Law Chapter-Wise Questions:
Practise questions from individual chapters, including the Indian Partnership Act, Limited Liability Partnership Act, Companies Act and Negotiable Instruments Act.
CA Foundation Business Laws PYQs:
Solve previous-year questions to understand the examination pattern, marks distribution, and commonly tested concepts.
CA Foundation Law Notes:
Refer to chapter-wise notes to revise important sections, definitions, legal provisions and explanations.
Business Laws Practice Questions:
Attempt both theoretical and case-based questions to understand how legal provisions are applied to practical situations.
Mock Tests and Sample Papers:
Solve full-length papers within the prescribed time to improve answer-writing speed and time management.
Regular Revision:
Revise important sections, legal definitions and exceptions regularly. Practise writing answers in points wherever required to make your explanations clear.
Consistent revision and regular question practice are important for preparing for the Business Laws section of the CA Foundation January 2027 examination. Practise the important questions, refer to chapter-wise notes and solve previous-year papers to become familiar with the different question formats. You can also use PW's dedicated CA Foundation batches, live and recorded classes, study notes and practice resources to support your preparation and work on topics that need more attention.
