Ashish Yadav’s CA Inter May 2026 result brought him AIR 42, along with 97 marks in Costing. His preparation was built less around drastic changes and more around maintaining a routine that he could follow every day. From completing his backlog before starting the final revision phase to revising classwork daily, Ashish focused on keeping his preparation consistent.
His interview with the PW faculty also reveals how he handled social media, theory-heavy subjects, question practice, revision, demotivation, and the final weeks before the examination.
Ashish did not completely disconnect from social media while preparing for CA Inter. Instead, he created a schedule and decided how much time he could give to his phone without letting it interfere with his studies.
Explaining his approach, he said:
“Sir main apna schedule bana ke chalta tha. Matlab jyada lamba nahi ek do hafte ka. Uske hisab se din mein jitne gaps hote the, usi time bas mobile use karta tha. Ye nahi tha ki paper pass aa rahe hain to maine Instagram, WhatsApp ye delete kar diya ya use nahi kiya. Us time bhi maine use kiya hai. Paper ke time bhi bas limited jitna maine apna time laga ke rakha hai bas usse jyada nahi.”
Rather than making social media completely off-limits, Ashish kept it within a defined limit. This allowed him to continue with his routine even as the examination approached.
His approach also extended to his study hours. Once his backlog was cleared, he focused on making his available time productive instead of simply chasing a fixed number of hours.
By the end of January, the syllabus had been completed in coaching, but Ashish still had a considerable personal backlog. He used February to complete it, leaving March and April for focused preparation before the examination.
He explained:
“Sir agar main apna bataun to jaise January end mein syllabus complete ho gaya tha. Hum matlab coaching mein ho gaya tha par mera nahi hua tha kyunki mera backlog tha bahut sara to maine February end tak apna backlog complete kiya phir mere paas do mahine bach rahe the March aur April ke phir maine ye nahi dekha ki main kitne revision kar sakta hun maine kaha bas effectively padhai karni hai jitne ghante main de sakta hun on an average 11 se 12 hours rehte the library jyada tha kabhi 12 se upar bhi hue hain kabhi neeche bhi hue hain par on an average 12 hours rehta tha.”
His focus during these two months was therefore not on chasing a particular number of revisions. He concentrated on studying effectively for the time available to him.
When asked whether those 12 hours were actually productive, Ashish clarified:
“Sir, productive hi rehta tha. Agar waise laga ke chalo to 12 se upar ho jate the. Productive to 11-12 aisa rehta tha.”
This distinction between total sitting time and productive study time became an important part of his preparation.
Ashish prepared through PW’s offline centre, where he attended classes with the faculty members featured in his result-day interaction. His preparation routine did not end when the classroom session was over. He made it a daily practice to revise what had been taught.
Talking about what he did after classes, Ashish said:
“Main classess khatam hone ke baad mera daily ka hota tha ki jaake aadhe ghante ya ek ghante ke andar jo padha hai bas usko jaldi se khatam karna ek baar revise karke acche se. Ye maine daily kiya hai, consistent daily karke isme kuch miss nahi kiya hai maine bas yahi cheez thi jo main daily karta tha.”
The classroom learning was therefore followed by same-day revision. Instead of allowing lessons to accumulate, Ashish tried to complete his daily work consistently.
He further described the result of this routine:
“Ashish ka daily ka homework done hota tha sir. Kuch bhi kahin se pooch lo sab kuch done hua karta tha. Pending jaisi koi cheez maine nahi dekhi.”
For Ashish, the role of his offline classes was closely tied to how consistently he followed up on what he studied. The daily cycle of attending classes and revising the material helped him keep his preparation moving without letting pending work build up.
Ashish used different approaches depending on the subject. In Costing, he placed particular emphasis on question practice after understanding a concept.
He said:
“Bas yah tha ki Costing mein question ki practice main karta tha. Jaise ki concept padhe to direct question karta tha. Question pe jyada dhyan deta tha.”
He also avoided immediately jumping to unfamiliar questions. Instead, he repeatedly practised the questions that he had already encountered in class.
“Aur ye nahi hai ki naye question pe jump kiya. Jo maine class mein padhe the usi ko first revision mein kiya. Usi ko second mein.”
This approach helped him reinforce the concepts through repeated practice. It also contributed to his strong performance in Costing, where he scored 97 marks.
For theory subjects such as Law and Audit, Ashish followed a different revision pattern. He used cumulative revision so that previously studied portions continued to remain in touch.
He explained:
“To theory subject mein aisa rehta tha. Maine class mein class li. Phir main apni PG jata tha. To jaise agar mujhe revision start karna hai jo class mein maine padha hai sabse pehle main theory start karta tha to jaise Law padhni hai to sabse pehle maine Law ki agar jo maine isse do din pehle padha tha usko bhi main revise karta tha, cumulative revision leke chalta tha saath mein.”
He followed a similar principle in Audit, where remembering the material was a priority before moving ahead.
“Aur Audit mein aisa rehta tha ki jo padha hai usko bas yaad karna hai kaise bhi karke. Sabse pehle Audit mein yahi approach tha ki yaad karke chalna hai.”
The idea was to prevent theory from piling up and to keep revisiting material instead of waiting until the end to remember it.
Even with a consistent routine, Ashish experienced moments when preparation became frustrating. Theory revision could sometimes feel repetitive, especially when he struggled to recall something he had studied a few days earlier.
He recalled:
“Sir jaise ki sabse pehle agar main theory yaad kar raha hun, Audit yaad kar raha hun to kabhi-kabhi frustrate ho jata tha ki wahi cheez padhte ja raha hun, padhte ja raha hun. Yaad nahi ho rahi hai. Phir aisa lagta tha demotivate ho jata tha ki yaar ho payega ki nahi ho payega.”
Instead of allowing that feeling to stop his preparation, he would take a short break and remind himself of the challenge he had chosen to take on.
“To phir main bas 5-10 minute ka pause leta tha us time aur phir manifest karta tha ki isi cheez ke liye to main yahan pe aaya tha. Agar ye challenges agar main face kar raha hun agar isko overcome kar paunga to bhi tabhi jaake rank aayegi ya phir main clear kar paunga.”
For Ashish, moments of doubt were part of the preparation itself. He used those moments to return to the larger goal rather than allowing temporary difficulty to determine his progress.
Ashish’s revision strategy evolved as the examination approached. Initially, he worked group-wise, completing Group 1 before moving to Group 2. Closer to the papers, he shifted to a combination of theory and practical subjects.
He explained:
“Sir jab maine revision start kiya tha to mera aisa tha ki main ek subject jyada padh nahi sakta tha. Haan to phir jab revision start kiya to us time main subject le chalta tha. Group-wise karta tha. Pehle Group One complete kar diya uske baad Group Two. Phir jab paper ka time najdeek aaya, phir maine do-do subject karke kiya. Ek theory ek practical.”
His daily routine during the final phase followed the same combination:
“To subah sabse pehle theory karta tha chhe saat ghante. Jo target banaya hai bas usko complete kar leta tha. Phir uske baad practical pe jump kar deta tha. Aise do-do subject kar leta tha.”
This gave him a way to balance different types of preparation instead of spending the entire day on only theory or only practical subjects.
Ashish’s AIR 42 in CA Inter May 2026 came after a preparation journey centred on consistency rather than a single last-minute strategy. He managed his social media use instead of eliminating it completely, studied around 11–12 productive hours on average, cleared his backlog before the final revision phase, and maintained daily revision after classes.
His subject-wise preparation also remained practical: question practice for Costing, cumulative revision for theory subjects, and a combination of theory and practical subjects as the exams approached. Along the way, he dealt with periods of frustration by taking short breaks and returning to his larger goal.
For CA Inter aspirants, Ashish’s journey offers a realistic lesson: a strong result can come from keeping everyday preparation under control. His AIR 42 and 97 marks in Costing were the outcome of repeatedly doing the basics well: attending classes, completing daily work, revising consistently, practising questions, and staying focused through the difficult phases.