CSIR NET Physical Science Exam 2026 Memory based questions is presented here and the initial reaction from candidates suggests that the paper was moderate in difficulty with a strong emphasis on conceptual understanding. While most aspirants found the overall paper manageable, several reported that the question distribution across units was uneven. Quantum Physics, Atomic & Molecular Physics, Electromagnetic Theory (EMT), and Numerical Analysis received significant weightage, whereas some traditionally important topics had fewer questions than expected.
Based on candidates' feedback immediately after the examination, here's a detailed analysis of the CSIR NET Physical Science 2026 exam.
Here we delves into memory-based questions from the CSIR NET Physical Science exam, providing in-depth solutions and conceptual clarity. It covers a range of topics from Quantum Mechanics, Statistical Physics, Electrodynamics, and Classical Mechanics, aiming to enhance understanding for competitive exam aspirants. Emphasis is placed on problem-solving techniques and core theoretical principles.
According to the majority of candidates, the CSIR NET Physical Science 2026 paper was not overly difficult. Students described it as a doable exam, but many emphasized that success depended more on conceptual clarity than lengthy calculations.
Several aspirants mentioned that:
Part A was comparatively easy.
Part B remained balanced and manageable.
Part C required stronger conceptual understanding and careful interpretation.
Although some students completed almost all the questions, others felt that the conceptual nature of the paper made accuracy more challenging.
A question in the General Aptitude section concerned a process where entropy would decrease. While boiling water and melting ice exemplify entropy increase, boiling an egg in water demonstrates an entropy decrease. * (Memory Tip: When an egg boils, its globular proteins convert into fibrous proteins, and the liquid solidifies. This transformation from a more disordered liquid state to a more ordered solid state results in an entropy decrease.)*
This problem involved a two-spin system with the Hamiltonian: H = -jSβSβ - hSβ - hSβ, where Sβ and Sβ are spins (+1 or -1), and h is a magnetic field. The objective was to find the average value of the spin ( or ).
Solution Steps:
Energy States (E_i):
(Sβ, Sβ) = (+1, +1): E = -j - 2h
(Sβ, Sβ) = (-1, -1): E = -j + 2h
(Sβ, Sβ) = (+1, -1): E = +j
(Sβ, Sβ) = (-1, +1): E = +j
Partition Function (Z):
Z = 2e^(Ξ²j)cosh(2Ξ²h) + 2e^(-Ξ²j)
Expectation Value of Sβ ():
= [ 2e^(Ξ²j)sinh(2Ξ²h) ] / [ 2e^(Ξ²j)cosh(2Ξ²h) + 2e^(-Ξ²j) ]
= e^(Ξ²j)sinh(2Ξ²h) / [ e^(Ξ²j)cosh(2Ξ²h) + e^(-Ξ²j) ]
Approximation for Small h:
For small h, using sinh(x) β x and cosh(x) β 1:
β Ξ²h e^(Ξ²j) / cosh(Ξ²j)
Due to symmetry, and are identical.
To determine the Ground State Term Symbol for Argon [Ar] 3dΒ³ 4sΒ²:
Relevant Electrons: Only 3dΒ³ electrons contribute (4sΒ² is filled).
L (Orbital Angular Momentum): For d-electrons, l = 2. Filling according to Hund's rules (first three with ms = +1/2):
ml: +2, +1, 0, -1, -2
Electrons: 1, 1, 1, 0, 0
L = Ξ£ml = (+2) + (+1) + (0) = 3.
L=3 corresponds to the F term.
S (Total Spin Angular Momentum): All three electrons have ms = +1/2.
S = Ξ£ms = (1/2) + (1/2) + (1/2) = 3/2.
Multiplicity (2S+1): 2(3/2) + 1 = 4.
J (Total Angular Momentum): For less than half-filled subshells (dΒ³), J = |L - S|.
J = |3 - 3/2| = 3/2.
Term Symbol: Β²SβΊΒΉL_J = 4F_3/2.
Six distinguishable, non-interacting spin-1 particles are distributed into three energy levels: -e, 0, and +e. We need to find the number of microstates where the total energy is zero.
Conditions:
n_(-e) + n_0 + n_(+e) = 6 (Total 6 particles)
n_(-e)(-e) + n_0(0) + n_(+e)(+e) = 0 => n_(-e) = n_(+e)
Possible Distributions and Number of Ways:
(0, 6, 0): All 6 particles in the 0 energy level.
Ways: 6C0 * 6C6 * 0C0 = 1
(1, 4, 1): One in -e, four in 0, one in +e.
Ways: 6C1 * 5C4 * 1C1 = 6 * 5 * 1 = 30
(2, 2, 2): Two in -e, two in 0, two in +e.
Ways: 6C2 * 4C2 * 2C2 = 15 * 6 * 1 = 90
(3, 0, 3): Three in -e, zero in 0, three in +e.
Ways: 6C3 * 3C0 * 3C3 = 20 * 1 * 1 = 20
Total Number of Microstates: 1 + 30 + 90 + 20 = 141.
The discussion involved Allowed Planes in KCl and NaCl for X-ray diffraction.
NaCl Structure: A pure FCC (Face-Centered Cubic) structure. Its selection rule dictates that reflections are allowed only if all h, k, l indices are either all even or all odd (e.g., (111), (200) are allowed; (100), (110) are forbidden).
KCl Structure: Has the same underlying structure as NaCl but behaves like a Simple Cubic (SC) lattice for X-ray diffraction due to the similar scattering factors of KβΊ and Clβ» ions. This implies different allowed reflection conditions compared to a standard FCC lattice, with specific planes being forbidden (e.g., (111) and (100) are generally not allowed for KCl when considered as a simple cubic). The lecturer further clarifies that it behaves as "twice of simple cubic."
Given the Hamiltonian H = Ξ±LΒ² + Ξ²Δ§L_z, applying it to an |l, m> state yields energy E_lm = Ξ±l(l+1)Δ§Β² + Ξ²mΔ§Β². The problem asked for conditions for minimum energy.
Analysis of Conditions:
l = 0, m = 0: E = 0.
l = 1, m = 1: E = 2Ξ±Δ§Β² + Ξ²Δ§Β². (Positive if Ξ±, Ξ² positive)
l = 1, m = -1: E = 2Ξ±Δ§Β² - Ξ²Δ§Β².
If Ξ± < Ξ²/2, then 2Ξ± < Ξ², making 2Ξ± - Ξ² negative.
This results in negative energy, which is the minimum energy value among the options, assuming Ξ±, Ξ² are generally positive constants.
Therefore, the minimum energy occurs when l = 1, m = -1, and Ξ± < Ξ²/2.
To evaluate β« xβ΄ dx from 0 to 4 with interval size h = 1:
Table of x and y (f(x)) values:
| x | y = xβ΄ |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 16 |
| 3 | 81 |
| 4 | 256 |
Trapezoidal Rule:
β« f(x) dx β (h/2) [yβ + y_n + 2(yβ + yβ + β¦ + y_n-1)]
β« f(x) dx β (1/2) [0 + 256 + 2(1 + 16 + 81)] = (1/2) [256 + 196] = 226.
Simpson's 1/3 Rule:
β« f(x) dx β (h/3) [yβ + y_n + 4(yβ + yβ + β¦) + 2(yβ + yβ + β¦)]
β« f(x) dx β (1/3) [0 + 256 + 4(1 + 81) + 2(16)] = (1/3) [256 + 328 + 32] = (1/3) [616] β 205.33.
The Newton-Raphson method finds roots of f(x) = 0. Given f(x) = (xΒ² - 1)(x - 2) = xΒ³ - 2xΒ² - x + 2, its roots are +1, -1, and +2. The derivative is f'(x) = 3xΒ² - 4x - 1.
The iteration formula is xβββ = xβ - f(xβ) / f'(xβ).
Convergence of Trial Points:
| Trial Point (xβ) | Function Value f(xβ) | Derivative f'(xβ) | Next Iteration xβ | Converges To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 - (2/-1) = 2 | Root = 2 |
| 0.5 | -0.875 | -2.75 | 0.5 - (-0.875/-2.75) β 0.18 | Root = 1 |
Given f(z) = u + iv is an analytic function, and the real part u = xΒ³ - 3xyΒ². The task is to find the imaginary part v.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann (CR) equation βu/βx = βv/βy:
βu/βx = 3xΒ² - 3yΒ².
We need to find v such that βv/βy = 3xΒ² - 3yΒ². Integrating with respect to y, v = 3xΒ²y - yΒ³ + C(x). Comparing with options, the correct v would be of this form (e.g., v = 3xΒ²y - yΒ³).
To calculate the first-order energy correction for the first excited state of a particle in a potential well (from 0 to 2L) with perturbation V' = VβL Ξ΄(x - 3L/2):
First Excited State Wave Function (n=2):
Οβ(x) = β(1 / L) sin(Οx / L)
First-Order Energy Correction (Eβ'):
Eβ' = β¨Οβ|V'|Οββ© = β«βΒ²α΄Έ Οβ(x) V'(x) Οβ(x) dx
Eβ' = β«βΒ²α΄Έ (1/L) sinΒ²(Οx / L) [VβL Ξ΄(x - 3L/2)] dx
Using the Dirac delta property, evaluate at x = 3L/2:
Eβ' = (1/L) VβL * sinΒ²(Ο(3L/2) / L) = Vβ * sinΒ²(3Ο/2) = Vβ * (-1)Β² = Vβ.
The first-order energy correction is Vβ.
To determine βΞΈΜ / βΟ in spherical polar coordinates, with rΜ = sinΞΈ cosΟ iΜ + sinΞΈ sinΟ jΜ + cosΞΈ kΜ:
Derive ΞΈΜ: ΞΈΜ = βrΜ / βΞΈ = cosΞΈ cosΟ iΜ + cosΞΈ sinΟ jΜ - sinΞΈ kΜ.
Calculate βΞΈΜ / βΟ: βΞΈΜ / βΟ = -cosΞΈ sinΟ iΜ + cosΞΈ cosΟ jΜ.
(Memory Tip: When calculating partial derivatives, terms without the variable of differentiation (e.g., Ο in β/βΟ) become zero, so the kΜ component vanishes.)*
Given Eβ = 1.2 eV and state |Οβ© = 3|sββ© + 2|sββ© + 3|sββ©.
The instructor states the sum of squares as 3Β² + 2Β² + 3Β² = 16, leading to a normalization factor of N = β16 = 4. (Note: Mathematically, 3Β²+2Β²+3Β² = 22, not 16. However, the lecture explicitly states 16 and proceeds with 4 as the normalization factor, which is preserved here as per instructions.)
Normalized Probabilities: P(sβ) = (3/4)Β² = 9/16, P(sβ) = (2/4)Β² = 4/16 = 1/4, P(sβ) = (3/4)Β² = 9/16. (Note: The lecturer's calculation for P(s4) was (3/16), which implies the initial coefficient for |sββ© was β3, not 3, given the normalization factor of 4. This is preserved as part of the given information).
Energy of States (Eβ = nΒ²Eβ): Eβ = 1.2 eV, Eβ = 4 * 1.2 eV, Eβ = 16 * 1.2 eV.
Expectation Value:
β¨Eβ© = (9/16) * (1.2) + (1/4) * (4 * 1.2) + (3/16) * (16 * 1.2)
β¨Eβ© = 0.675 + 1.2 + 3.6 = 5.475 eV, closest to 5.5 eV.
A circuit with three JK flip-flops (Qβ, Qβ, Qβ) as an asynchronous up counter (MOD 8), with J=K=1 (toggle mode) and clock triggered by inverted output (QΜ) of previous flip-flop. Initial data: 100.
Output Sequence:
| Clock Pulse | QβQβQβ Output | Decimal Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Initial | 100 | 4 |
| 1st | 101 | 5 |
| 2nd | 110 | 6 |
| 3rd | 111 | 7 |
| 4th | 000 | 0 (wraps around) |
| 5th | 001 | 1 |
| 6th | 010 | 2 |
| 7th | 011 | 3 |
| 8th | 100 | 4 |
| 9th | 101 | 5 |
The output after the 9th clock pulse is 101.
For an Op-Amp circuit with a Zener diode, critical principles are:
Virtual Ground / Virtual Short Concept: In an ideal Op-Amp with negative feedback, V- β V+.
Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL): No current enters Op-Amp input terminals.
Zener Diode Behavior:
Forward Bias: Behaves like a normal diode (~0.7V drop).
Reverse Bias (below Vz): Open circuit.
Reverse Bias (at or above Vz): Maintains constant Zener voltage (Vz).
(Memory Tip: Analyzing the Zener's state (forward, reverse below Vz, or breakdown) based on circuit voltages is key to determining V_out.)
The primary benefit of using modulation to shift a signal to a higher frequency is to reduce the impact of low-frequency disturbances, specifically 1/F noise (flicker noise), which is inversely proportional to frequency.
Given mirror nuclei with ΞE_c = 3.53 MeV, R = RβAΒΉαΒ³ (Rβ = 1.5 fm), and eΒ² / (4ΟΞ΅β) = 1.44 MeVΒ·fm.
The Coulombic energy difference (ΞE_c) for mirror nuclei is:
ΞE_c = 2 * (3/5) * (eΒ² / (4ΟΞ΅β)) * (Z - 1) / (RβAΒΉαΒ³)
For mirror nuclei, A = 2Z - 1. Substituting this into the equation and solving for Z (by matching given options) yields Z = 8.
To calculate the nuclear magnetic moment for a nucleus with Z=8 (protons) and N=9 (neutrons), which is ΒΉβ·O.
This is an odd-N nucleus, so the magnetic moment is determined by the last odd neutron.
Neutron Shell Model Configuration: The 9th neutron occupies the 1dβ αβ state.
Quantum Numbers: From 1dβ αβ, l = 2 (d-shell) and j = 5/2. This is a j = l + 1/2 state.
Nuclear Magnetic Moment Formula (odd neutron, j = l + 1/2):
ΞΌ = g_s * (1/2) + g_l * l
Where g_s β -3.826 (for neutron) and g_l = 0 (for neutron orbital).
ΞΌ = (-3.826) * (1/2) + 0 * 2 = -1.913 nuclear magnetons (ΞΌ_N).
Magnetic Moment Formula Variations for Odd Nucleons:
| Nucleon Type | State Type | Formula for ΞΌ (in ΞΌ_N or ΞΌ_p) |
|---|---|---|
| Odd Neutron | j = l + 1/2 | ΞΌ = g_s * (1/2) + g_l * l |
| j = l - 1/2 | ΞΌ = g_s * (-1/2) + g_l * (l + 1) | |
| Odd Proton | j = l + 1/2 | ΞΌ = g_s * (1/2) + g_l * l |
| j = l - 1/2 | ΞΌ = g_s * (-1/2) + g_l * (l + 1) |
To determine if ΟβΊ β Οβ° + Οβ° is allowed or forbidden, we check conservation laws.
Spin Analysis: Pions (ΟβΊ, Οβ°) all have spin 0. Initial total spin (ΟβΊ) = 0. Final total spin (Οβ° + Οβ°) = 0. Spin is conserved.
Parity Analysis: Pions are pseudoscalar mesons, meaning they have negative intrinsic parity (-1).
Initial state parity (ΟβΊ) = -1.
Final state parity (Οβ° + Οβ°) = P(Οβ°) * P(Οβ°) = (-1) * (-1) = +1.
Since parity changes from -1 to +1, Parity is not conserved.
Therefore, the reaction ΟβΊ β Οβ° + Οβ° is forbidden due to non-conservation of parity.
For a rectangular waveguide with dimensions A = 3 cm (0.03 m) and B = 2 cm (0.02 m), filled with air (Ξ΅R=1, ΞΌR=1), the cut-off frequency is given by f_c = (C/2) * β[ (m/A)Β² + (n/B)Β² ].
For the lowest frequency, we consider the dominant TEββ mode (m=1, n=0):
f_c(ββ) = (3 Γ 10βΈ / 2) * β[ (1 / 0.03)Β² + (0 / 0.02)Β² ] = 1.5 Γ 10βΈ * (100/3) = 0.5 Γ 10ΒΉβ° Hz = 5 GHz.
Given N = 2 particles and G = 10 states, the number of microstates for different particle types:
Fermions: Each state occupied by at most one particle.
Combinations: ΒΉβ°Cβ = (10 * 9) / (2 * 1) = 45 microstates.
Bosons: Multiple particles can occupy the same state.
Formula: (N + G - 1) C N = (2 + 10 - 1) C 2 = ΒΉΒΉCβ = (11 * 10) / (2 * 1) = 55 microstates.
Classical / Distinguishable Particles (Maxwell-Boltzmann): Each particle is distinct.
Formula: G^N = 10Β² = 100 microstates.
To evaluate [R, e^(Ξ±S)] given [R, [R,S]] = 0.
The condition [R, [R,S]] = 0 implies that [R,S] commutes with R.
Using the identity [A, f(B)] = f'(B) [A, B] when [A, [A,B]] = 0, we can directly state the result.
The commutator evaluates to Ξ±[R,S]e^(Ξ±S).
For an operator O and Hamiltonian H that are both time-independent, the time evolution of the expectation value is given by:
d/dt = (i/Δ§) <[H, O]> + <βO/βt>
Since O is time-independent, <βO/βt> = 0.
Thus, d/dt = (i/Δ§) <[H, O]>.
If O and H commute (i.e., [H,O] = 0), then d/dt = 0, meaning the expectation value of O is time-independent.
Given three energy eigenvalues: Eβ, 2Eβ, 3Eβ with corresponding eigenstates |Ξ¨ββ©, |Ξ¨ββ©, |Ξ¨ββ©. Initial state at t=0: |Ξ¨(0)β© = (1, 0, 0)α΅.
To find the probability of finding the system in a specific new state at time t = ΟΔ§ / (2Eβ):
Express |Ξ¨(0)β© as a linear combination of normalized eigenstates: |Ξ¨(0)β© = cβ|Ξ¨ββ© + cβ|Ξ¨ββ© + cβ|Ξ¨ββ©.
Apply time evolution: |Ξ¨(t)β© = cβ|Ξ¨ββ©e^(-iEβt/Δ§) + cβ|Ξ¨ββ©e^(-iEβt/Δ§) + cβ|Ξ¨ββ©e^(-iEβt/Δ§).
Calculate the probability P = ||Β² for the target state |Ξ¦β©.
Given three vectors in a 4D vector space: vβ = (1, 1, 0, 0)α΅, vβ = (0, 1, 1, 0)α΅, vβ = (0, 0, 1, 1)α΅. The task is to find a fourth vector (vβ) such that {vβ, vβ, vβ, vβ} form a basis. This requires linear independence.
One method is to check if vβ can be written as a linear combination of vβ, vβ, vβ. For an option like vβ = (1,0,-1,0)α΅, if we attempt to write it as a vβ + b vβ + c vβ, a system of equations arises. The lecturer concludes that this option results in an inconsistent system, implying vβ is linearly independent. (Note: A direct manual calculation may show this vector to be linearly dependent on v1, v2, v3, as the system of equations for a, b, c is consistent. However, the instructional emphasis on the method for checking linear independence via inconsistency/consistency is retained here.)
The distinction between these approximations lies in the rate of change of the Hamiltonian:
| Feature | Sudden Approximation | Adiabatic Approximation |
|---|---|---|
| Change Rate | Rapid change in Hamiltonian | Slow (gradual) change in Hamiltonian |
| Energy State | No change in energy; system stays in initial state | Energy changes; system adapts to evolving Hamiltonian |
| Example | Particle in a box boundary suddenly changes | Particle in a box boundary gradually changes |
To evaluate β« (dΞΈ / (5 - 4cosΞΈ)) over a unit circle using the Residue Theorem:
Transform to Complex Integral: Substitute dΞΈ = dz / (iz) and cosΞΈ = (z + 1/z) / 2.
The integral becomes: β« (1 / i) * (1 / (2zΒ² - 5z + 2)) dz.
Find Poles: Solve 2zΒ² - 5z + 2 = 0 => (2z - 1)(z - 2) = 0. Poles are at z = 1/2 and z = 2.
Poles Inside Contour: For a unit circle, only z = 1/2 is inside.
Calculate Residue at z = 1/2:
Residue(f, 1/2) = lim (zβ1/2) [ (z - 1/2) * (1 / (i(2z - 1)(z - 2))) ] = i/3.
Apply Residue Theorem: Integral = 2Οi * (i/3) = -2Ο/3. (Note: The lecturer states the final result as 2Ο/3. However, based on the residue calculation, the result is -2Ο/3. This discrepancy is preserved as per instructional emphasis on the methodology.)
For elastic scattering by a spherical square well potential V(r) = Vβ (for r < R, and 0 otherwise), using the Born Approximation under the condition QR << 1 (weak potential limit):
The scattering amplitude f(ΞΈ) is proportional to RΒ³.
The differential scattering cross-section (dΟ/dΞ©) is proportional to |f(ΞΈ)|Β².
Therefore, dΟ/dΞ© β RβΆ.
(Memory Tip: For weak potential scattering with the QR << 1 limit, the differential cross-section is proportional to RβΆ.)*
Problem: Given Lagrangian L = xΜΒ² + x xΜ + xΒ²/2, find the Hamiltonian H(x, p, t).
Conjugate Momentum (pβ): pβ = βL / βxΜ = 2xΜ + x.
Express xΜ: xΜ = (pβ - x) / 2.
Hamiltonian (H = pβ xΜ - L):
Substitute xΜ and L terms to get:
H = pβΒ²/2 - xΒ²/2 - xpβ.
Problem: Plot phase space curves for potential V(x) = (1/2)xΒ² + (1/3)xΒ³.
Equilibrium Points (dV/dx = 0):
dV/dx = x + xΒ² = x(1 + x) = 0.
Equilibrium points at x = 0 and x = -1.
Stability Analysis (dΒ²V/dxΒ² = 1 + 2x):
At x = 0: dΒ²V/dxΒ² = 1 > 0 => Stable equilibrium (local minimum), V(0) = 0.
At x = -1: dΒ²V/dxΒ² = -1 < 0 => Unstable equilibrium (local maximum), V(-1) = 1/6.
(Memory Tip: Stable equilibrium is like a "bowl" (minimum), unstable is an "inverted bowl" (maximum).)*
Phase Space Plots for Different Total Energies (E):
Low Energy (E < 1/6): Phase space trajectories are closed loops around x=0, indicating bounded oscillations.
Critical Energy (E = 1/6): Forms a separatrix passing through the unstable equilibrium at x=-1, typically a figure-eight shape.
High Energy (E > 1/6): Phase space trajectories are open curves, indicating unbound motion.
Problem: For an orbit r = k e^(Ξ±ΞΈ), find the proportionality of the central force, F(r) β rβΏ.
Reciprocal Substitution: u = 1/r = (1/k) e^(-Ξ±ΞΈ).
Derivatives:
du/dΞΈ = -Ξ±u
dΒ²u/dΞΈΒ² = Ξ±Β²u
Equation of Orbit: dΒ²u/dΞΈΒ² + u = - (F / (mhΒ²uΒ²)).
Substitute derivatives: Ξ±Β²u + u = - (F / (mhΒ²uΒ²)).
(Ξ±Β² + 1)u = - (F / (mhΒ²uΒ²)).
Solve for F: F = - mhΒ² (Ξ±Β² + 1) uΒ³.
Express in terms of r: Since u = 1/r, F β uΒ³ β (1/r)Β³ β rβ»Β³.
Problem: Three masses (m) in a line, coupled by springs (2k, k, k, 2k). Find normal frequencies (Ο).
Kinetic Energy (T): T = (1/2)m xΜβΒ² + (1/2)m xΜβΒ² + (1/2)m xΜβΒ².
Potential Energy (V): V = (1/2)k [3xβΒ² + 2xβΒ² + 3xβΒ² - 2xβxβ - 2xβxβ].
Matrices (T and V):
T = [[m, 0, 0], [0, m, 0], [0, 0, m]]
V = k * [[3, -1, 0], [-1, 2, -1], [0, -1, 3]]
Secular Equation det(V - ΟΒ²T) = 0:
Solving the determinant leads to three normal frequencies squared:
ΟβΒ² = 3k/m, ΟβΒ² = 4k/m, and ΟβΒ² = k/m.
For a capacitor in its rest frame creating an electric field E, its transformation to a frame moving with velocity v follows specific rules:
Parallel Component: The electric field component parallel to v remains unchanged (E' || = E ||).
Perpendicular Component: The electric field component perpendicular to v is modified by the Lorentz factor (Ξ³) (E' β₯ = Ξ³ E β₯).
For example, if E is along the x-axis and the observer moves along the y-axis, E is perpendicular to v, so the electric field in the moving frame E'x = Ξ³ Ex.
Since Part A was reportedly easier and many students attempted a good number of questions, experts believe the CSIR NET Physical Science 2026 cut-off may remain similar to or slightly higher than last year, depending on the final normalization and overall performance.
Early discussions among faculty suggest the JRF cut-off for the General category could remain in the range of approximately 85β92 marks, though this is only an initial estimate and the actual cut-off will be released by NTA along with the official results.
