Parliamentary Panel Raises Questions Over CUET, Recommends Review of Exam Structure

A parliamentary committee has expressed concerns over the Common University Entrance Test (CUET), stating that its multiple-choice question (MCQ) format may not be the most appropriate method for evaluating students in humanities and social science subjects. The panel has also called for a review of the examination's design and question quality in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.

Purpose Behind CUET

The committee noted that CUET was introduced from the 2022-23 academic session with the objective of reducing the burden on students, universities, and the broader education system. It was also intended to create a common platform for candidates from different educational boards and place them on an equal footing during the admission process.

Concerns Raised by the Committee

Despite these objectives, the committee observed that some of its members remain unconvinced about the effectiveness of CUET as a universal admission mechanism for undergraduate programmes.

The panel highlighted concerns that a uniform MCQ-based examination may not adequately assess students seeking admission to humanities and social science disciplines.

Recommendation for Review

In its report submitted to Rajya Sabha Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan on Tuesday, the committee recommended a review of CUET's overall design and the quality of questions being asked.

According to the panel, such a review should be carried out in accordance with the principles and goals outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.