

UCEED Exam Analysis 2025 allows students to evaluate both the structure and the challenging topics of the exam. Undergraduate Common Entrance Examination for Design (UCEED) is one of the most sought-after design entrance exams in India. Thousands of candidates take this exam every year in order to secure admission in the best IIT design colleges.
Institute of technology Bombay (IIT Bombay) has conducted the UCEED 2025 exam on Sunday, January 19, 2025. As per the official notification, the UCEED 2026 exam date is Sunday, January 18, 2026. Aspirants who are preparing for the upcoming session can refer to the UCEED 2025 analysis to get an idea about the question trends, paper pattern, and difficulty level.
The UCEED Exam Analysis 2025 also highlights how some questions were based on the old pattern whereas others were new and tested the candidate’s imagination. Students UCEED feedback and in-depth UCEED performance analysis of this report will help the future aspirants to gear up for the exam.
IIT Bombay plan to organize the UCEED 2026 on January 18, 2026, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. On October 1, 2025, the official notification will be posted on the official website. The UCEED Exam is divided into two parts: Part A will be computer-based, and Part B will be a pen-and-paper drawing test, both of which must be completed in 3 hours.
UCEED Exam 2026 Part A will comprise NAT, MSQ, and MCQ questions, while Part B will include sketching and visualisation skills. The UCEED Exam will assess students' creativity, design, and problem-solving skills rather than their academic knowledge.
The UCEED Exam Analysis 2025 provides an overall understanding of the paper pattern, section-wise difficulty, and good attempts expected. There were two parts to the UCEED exam 2025 — Part A and Part B, and the UCEED exam was of around 300 marks in total.
According to the UCEED paper pattern analysis, Part A was the computer-based test with three sections: Numerical Answer Type (NAT), Multiple Select Questions (MSQ), and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ). Part B was the pen-and-paper test based on drawing and creative visualization.
The UCEED exam difficulty analysis shows that while Part A was more straightforward, Part B needed candidates to be creative with clear visualization. Candidates with better sketching and spatial abilities found the exam more comfortable and could score high. The UCEED question trend 2025 had problems based on logical reasoning, design awareness, and visualization.
The UCEED Exam Analysis 2025 revealed that the paper was “easy to moderate.” The overall UCEED paper analysis shows that Part A had a fair distribution of simple and moderate level questions. However, Part B was slightly more difficult.
Candidates who attempted mock tests and previous year’s papers also reported that the overall difficulty level was manageable. However, a majority did mention that the paper was quite long and time was a constraint. Logical reasoning and visualization are the areas that can fetch you the most score. The table below deciphers the overall and section-wise difficulty levels of UCEED 2025 along with the topics that carry a higher weightage.
| UCEED Exam Difficulty 2025 | |
| Parameter | Analysis |
| Difficulty level of the overall paper | Moderate |
| Difficulty level of Part A Section 1: Numerical Answer Type | Easy to Moderate |
| Difficulty level of Part A Section 2: Multiple Select Questions | Easy |
| Difficulty level of Part A Section 3: Multiple Choice Questions | Moderate |
| Difficulty level of Part B | Moderate to Tough |
| Topics with High Weightage | Visualization and Spatial Ability, Logical Reasoning, Environmental and Social Awareness |
The UCEED paper analysis also included the number of questions students could reasonably attempt correctly to get a good score.
| UCEED Paper Analysis 2025 Good Attempts | ||
| Section | Total Questions | Expected Good Attempts |
| Part A Section 1 | 14 | 9 |
| Part A Section 2 | 15 | 11 |
| Part A Section 3 | 28 | 20 |
| Part B | 2 | 1 |
| Overall | 59 | 41 |
The UCEED students feedback 2025 provides an authentic view of the paper and the students experience. Most of the students mentioned that the paper was reasonable, balanced, and a bit time-consuming. A few common responses are as follows:
A lot of candidates found the mathematical reasoning questions a bit difficult and require in-depth knowledge.
According to students, “The logical reasoning section was much easier than expected but spatial ability was a bit tricky with 3D visualizations.”
One of the students commented, “It was a good exam experience overall. The aptitude section was easy, but the drawing section was extremely tough.”
In short, the candidates agreed that the exam focused on practical intelligence rather than a student’s memory. The UCEED paper analysis is clearly evident of this trend as it is creativity and visualization based.