NEET PG 2025-26 CutOff Reduction Challenged in Supreme Court: The Supreme Court of India is reviewing petitions challenging the adjusted cutoff for the NEET PG 2025-26 academic session on April 28, 2026. It has sparked discussion regarding the standards for postgraduate medical admissions and the preservation of merit. The Central Government has publicly supported its policy. Therefore, petitions have been filed for the legal examination of the decision's implications for medical education.
Also Read - NEET PG 2026 Syllabus
Upgrade your prep with expert-led NEET PG Online Courses
The Supreme Court has decided to begin hearing the petitions regarding the NEET PG cutoff reduction. Petitions have been filed with concerns related to the NEET PG reducing cutoff marks.
|
Supreme Court Hearing Details |
|
|---|---|
|
Hearing Date |
April 28, 2026 |
|
Judicial Bench |
To be released. |
Petitioners have presented several arguments to the court, highlighting potential issues arising from the cutoff reduction.
The reduction may undermine merit-based selection in medical admissions.
Candidates with higher scores might face disadvantages in the admission process.
Concerns have been raised regarding the overall quality of postgraduate medical education.
It was noted that vacant seats were not exclusively due to high cutoff scores.
The Central Government has provided its rationale for the decision to reduce the NEET PG 2025-26 cutoff. It emphasises different aspects of the examination's role.
NEET PG serves as a qualifying gateway examination.
Eligibility for admission still requires an MBBS degree.
Admission standards for specialisation courses remain intact.
The government clarified that the exam is not directly linked to academic performance in postgraduate studies.
A special round of counselling was cancelled earlier.
Admissions made after February 28, 2026, were declared invalid.
These measures were implemented to maintain transparency within the admission framework.
Over 1,100 seats remained vacant across various institutions.
High course fees were cited as a significant barrier for many candidates.
The cutoff was reduced to below zero marks for certain categories of candidates.