UGC NET Re Exam 2026 Sociology Exam Analysis for the 10th September Shift 1 is available based on the initial feedback shared by candidates and the subject expert. The Sociology paper was overall reported to be moderate, with a mix of easy, moderate and some comparatively challenging questions. Several questions were based on thinkers, concepts, research methodology, books, Indian sociology, feminism, development and social movements.
As per the discussion, Paper 1 was considered comparatively difficult, particularly the Data Interpretation (DI) section, while Paper 2 Sociology was mostly moderate. Candidates also reported lengthy passages and some lengthy Match the Following questions. The expert suggested that the UGC NET Sociology cutoff 2026 may remain high because the paper included several familiar concepts and previous-year-question-based topics.
The overall difficulty level of the UGC NET Sociology 10th September Shift 1 paper was assessed as moderate. The expert explained that the paper was neither completely easy nor extremely difficult because questions were distributed across different difficulty levels.
Some questions were directly based on concepts taught in classes, while others required candidates to remember specific thinkers, books, theories and factual information. Match the Following questions were of two types: some could be solved if candidates knew even two options, while others involved mathematical calculations and required more time.
Paper 2 Sociology was largely reported as moderate, with some questions being easy and some requiring more conceptual or factual knowledge.
The major areas reported in the paper included:
Sociological thinkers and theories
Research methodology and research ethics
Indian sociology
Family, marriage and kinship
Feminism and gender
Development and underdevelopment
Globalisation
Urbanisation
Political economy
Social movements
Books and authors
Acts and government schemes
Match the Following questions
Passage-based questions
The expert noted that many questions were familiar and several topics had been covered in previous classes and practice sessions.
According to the discussion, Paper 1 was considered difficult to moderate, with Data Interpretation being one of the challenging sections. The DI questions were described as lengthy and comparatively difficult.
The expert also mentioned that candidates had reported lengthy Match the Following questions. However, the overall Paper 1 difficulty may vary from candidate to candidate depending on their strengths in mathematics and reasoning.
Several important Sociology topics and thinkers were recalled during the exam analysis session. The following topics were specifically mentioned in the discussion:
| Topic/Thinker | Area |
| Martins' KUDOS Framework | Sociology |
| Reflexivity | Sociological Theory |
| Hypogamy | Marriage |
| Weber's Ideal Types | Sociological Theory |
| Bruno Latour | Actor-Network Theory |
| Informed Consent | Research Ethics |
| Pierre Bourdieu | Sociological Theory |
| Social Structure by Murdock | Family/Social Structure |
| M.N. Srinivas | Indian Sociology |
| A.M. Shah | Indian Sociology |
| Triangulation | Research Methodology |
| Small Is Beautiful | Development |
| Soft State | Development |
| Samir Amin | Underdevelopment |
| Andre Gunder Frank | Underdevelopment |
| Hindu Succession Act | Indian Society/Law |
| Hindu Widow Remarriage Act | Indian Society |
| Hyper-urbanisation | Urban Sociology |
| Civil Religion | Sociology |
| Women in Development (WID) | Gender Studies |
| Howard Becker | Deviance |
| Self-Fulfilling Prophecy | Sociology |
| Marshall Mauss β The Gift | Anthropology/Sociology |
| Radical Feminism | Feminist Theory |
| Michel Foucault | Sociological Theory |
| Henri Lefebvre | Urban Sociology |
| Edward Soja | Urban Sociology |
| Alvin Toffler | Social Change |
| Roland Robertson | Globalisation |
| TeBhaga Movement | Social Movements |
| Telangana Movement | Social Movements |
| Political Economy by Marx | Marxism |
| Semi-Feudal Mode of Production | Agrarian Sociology |
| Neoliberalism | Political Economy |
| Queer Identity | Gender Studies |
| Karl Polanyi | Economic Sociology |
| Participant Observation | Research Methodology |
| Ontology | Research Methodology |
| Chicago School | Sociology |
| Ambedkar | Indian Sociology |
| Irawati Karve | Indian Sociology |
The paper included questions related to several classical and contemporary thinkers. Max Weber's Ideal Types, Pierre Bourdieu, Bruno Latour, Michel Foucault, Henri Lefebvre, Edward Soja and Roland Robertson were among the topics discussed during the analysis.
Questions related to Bourdieu's Theory of Practice were also mentioned, including chronology-based questions. The expert also highlighted questions on Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory and Weber's Ideal Types.
Indian Sociology was represented through thinkers and concepts including M.N. Srinivas, A.M. Shah, B.R. Ambedkar and Irawati Karve.
A Match the Following question related to M.N. Srinivas was discussed, particularly his concepts such as Sanskritization and Westernization.
Questions related to books on Indian villages were also mentioned. The discussion referred to books such as Indian Village and India's Villages, indicating that candidates needed to have knowledge of books and their authors.
Research methodology was another important area in the 10th September Shift 1 paper.
Questions were reported from:
Informed Consent
Research Ethics
Triangulation
Participant Observation
Observation
Ontology
Definitions related to research
Match the Following
The expert explained that triangulation and mixed-method research should not be treated as exactly the same concept, although they can overlap in research practice.
Questions from marriage, family and kinship were also discussed. These included hypogamy, patrilineal and matrilineal concepts, preferential marriage and Devar marriage.
The analysis also mentioned incest taboo. Candidates were advised to distinguish between similarly named books and concepts while answering such questions.
Feminist Sociology and gender-related topics were also present in the paper. The topics discussed included:
Radical Feminism
βPersonal is Politicalβ
Women in Development (WID)
Queer Identity
Surrogacy
Feminist House
Feminist publishing
The expert discussed a question related to the Feminist House and noted the importance of carefully reading the options because similarly worded options can create confusion.
Development and underdevelopment were important areas in the paper. Questions were discussed from:
Samir Amin
Andre Gunder Frank
Immanuel Wallerstein
Soft State
Small Is Beautiful
Third World
Political Economy
The expert specifically mentioned Samir Amin's ideas on underdevelopment and related them to other dependency and development perspectives.
The paper also included questions related to Howard Becker's concept of deviant career and the labelling theory of deviance.
The discussion connected deviant career with the idea that social labels can influence how individuals perceive themselves and behave. The concept of self-fulfilling prophecy, associated with Robert K. Merton, was also discussed.
Urban and global sociology also featured in the recalled questions.
Topics included:
Hyper-urbanisation
Henri Lefebvre
Edward Soja
Roland Robertson
Globalisation
Runaway World
Alvin Toffler
Third World
The expert noted that Lefebvre and Soja had been covered through discussions on space and urban sociology.
The passage-based section was reported to include questions related to the TeBhaga Movement and Telangana Movement. Candidates reportedly found the passage lengthy and difficult.
Questions related to social movements and Herbert Blumer were also discussed during the analysis.
The paper also contained some factual questions related to Acts and government schemes. The discussion specifically mentioned:
Hindu Succession Act
Hindu Widow Remarriage Act
Surrogacy Act
Patent Act
PM schemes
Candidates preparing for future attempts should revise important Acts, policies and schemes along with their key provisions and years.
Match the Following was one of the areas that required additional attention. According to the analysis, there were different types of Match the Following questions.
Some could be solved through elimination if candidates knew one or two correct pairs. However, some questions reportedly involved mathematical calculations, making them more time-consuming.
The expert suggested that candidates should use elimination techniques wherever possible instead of trying to solve every pair independently.
The passage-based section was considered one of the more difficult parts by some candidates. The passage was described as lengthy, with questions related to the TeBhaga and Telangana movements.
Candidates reported that the passage contained additional statements that consumed time. Therefore, passage-based questions may have contributed to the overall perception of the paper being moderate rather than easy.
According to the live discussion, candidates reported no Assertion-Reason questions in the Sociology paper. The expert specifically confirmed that there were zero Assertion-Reason questions based on the feedback received during the session.
Instead, the paper reportedly focused more on:
Match the Following
Direct statement-based questions
Definition-based questions
Conceptual questions
Passage-based questions
The exact UGC NET Sociology cutoff 2026 cannot be confirmed until the official result and cutoff are released. However, based on the exam analysis, the expert expected the cutoff to remain high.
The reasoning was that the paper contained several familiar and previously discussed concepts, along with a number of relatively easy questions. At the same time, some lengthy Match the Following questions and passage-based questions could have increased the overall difficulty.
The expert also referred to the previous December cutoff of around 232 marks and expressed the expectation that the current cutoff would remain high, while hoping that it would not rise as much as the previous session.
Therefore, candidates should treat the expected cutoff as an analysis-based estimate and wait for the official cutoff.
The major takeaways from the 10th September Shift 1 Sociology exam analysis are:
The overall Sociology Paper 2 level was moderate.
Paper 1 was considered comparatively difficult.
Data Interpretation was reported as lengthy and challenging.
Match the Following questions were important.
Some Match the Following questions involved calculations.
Passage-based questions were considered lengthy by candidates.
Several questions were based on familiar and previously studied concepts.
Thinkers, books and theories formed a major part of the paper.
Research methodology and ethics were important.
Indian Sociology topics were also covered.
Questions were asked from Acts and government schemes.
No Assertion-Reason questions were reported.
The Sociology cutoff is expected to remain high, although the official cutoff will determine the final qualifying marks.