IPMAT Analysis 2025 provides a detailed review of the entrance exams for IIM Indore and IIM Rohtak. The exam had questions from Quantitative Ability, Verbal Ability, and Logical Reasoning. Students found the Indore paper moderately tough, while the Rohtak exam was easier. This shows that having a strong preparation and understanding the basics was very important to do well.
Below is an overview of the IPMAT 2025 exam for IIM Indore and IIM Rohtak, highlighting the exam pattern, marking scheme, and difficulty level:
IPMAT Analysis 2025 Overview |
||||||
Section |
Question Type |
No. of Questions |
Maximum Marks |
Time Allotted |
Difficulty Level |
Key Highlights |
Quantitative Ability I |
Short Answer |
15 |
60 |
40 min |
Easy to Moderate |
Focus on basics; no negative marking |
Quantitative Ability II |
MCQs |
30 |
120 |
40 min |
Moderate to Challenging |
Multi-concept problems, data interpretation important; negative marking applies |
Verbal Ability |
MCQs + TITA |
45 |
180 |
40 min |
Moderate |
Vocabulary & inference-based questions; grammar and comprehension crucial negative marking applies |
Below is the detailed analysis of IPMAT Indore 2025, covering section-wise difficulty, topic-wise breakup, memory-based questions, student reactions, and expected cutoffs. The exam was moderately difficult overall, with Quantitative Ability (MCQ) being the trickiest, while the Short Answer section was comparatively easier.
The analysis also highlights important topics, question types and expected cutoffs to help aspirants strategize for future preparation.
The overall difficulty level for IPMAT 2025 was moderate to difficult, leaning slightly more towards the challenging side compared to last year IPMAT Indore:
IPMAT Analysis 2025 Section wise Difficulty Level |
|
Section |
Level of Difficulty |
Quantitative Aptitude (MCQs) |
Moderate to Difficult |
Quantitative Aptitude (Short Answer) |
Easy to Moderate |
Verbal Ability |
Moderate to Difficult |
Student reactions for IPMAT Exam analysis 2025 indicated that the exam was moderately challenging, with many finding it tougher than last year.
IPMAT Indore 2025 Analysis Student Reactions |
|
Section |
Student Feedback |
Quantitative Ability (Short Answer) |
Mostly manageable, though a few questions had ambiguous framing |
Quantitative Ability (MCQs) |
Tricky due to calculations and conceptual depth |
Verbal Ability |
Vocabulary and inference-based questions were more challenging than expected |
Overall |
Fundamentals played a key role; consistent practice with study material and mocks was helpful |
Below is the complete topic-wise breakup of the IPMAT Indore 2025 paper covering all sections for better clarity and preparation reference:
IPMAT Indore 2025 Paper Sectional Topic-wise Breakup |
||
Section |
Topic |
Number of Questions |
Quantitative Aptitude (MCQ) |
LRDI Set |
5 |
Matrices and Determinants |
1 |
|
AP, GP PYQs |
1 |
|
Permutation and Combination |
2 |
|
Probability (GP Concept) |
1 |
|
Remainders |
1 |
|
Number System |
1 |
|
Time, Speed, Distance (TSD) |
1 |
|
Geometric Progression (GP) |
1 |
|
Coordinate Geometry |
2 |
|
Polygon (Octagon) |
1 |
|
Logarithms + Proportion |
1 |
|
SICI |
1 |
|
Quantitative Aptitude (Short Answer) |
Age |
1 |
Logarithm |
2 |
|
Time and Work |
1 |
|
Geometry (Circle and Square) |
1 |
|
Logical Reasoning (LRDI Set) |
3 |
|
Remainder Theorem (Algebra) |
1 |
|
Arithmetic & Geometric Progression (AP/GP) |
1 |
|
Modulus |
1 |
|
Determinants and Matrices |
1 |
|
Number of Integral Solutions |
1 |
|
Verbal Ability (MCQ) |
Reading Comprehension |
18 (3 passages × 6 Qs) |
Grammar |
5 |
|
Vocabulary |
12 |
|
Parajumble |
5 |
|
Paracompletion |
5 |
Below is the expected cutoff range for IPMAT Indore 2025 section-wise. It gives an idea of the scores candidates likely need to secure to be considered for the next stage.
IPMAT Analysis 2025 Indore Expected Cutoff |
|
Section |
Expected Cut-Off Range (2025) |
QA – Short Answer |
24 – 28 marks |
QA – MCQ |
25 – 28 marks |
Verbal Ability |
91 – 96 marks |
The following table provides a memory-based overview of the types of questions asked in IPMAT Indore 2025 across all sections.
It highlights the key topics and question formats that appeared in the exam.
Memory-Based Question Types |
||
Section |
Question Type / Topic |
Details / Examples |
Quantitative Aptitude (SA) |
Geometry |
Area of triangle in a circle |
Number System |
Find number divisible by 310+23^{10} + 2310+2; perfect square factors of 35⋅72⋅583^5 \cdot 7^2 \cdot 5^835⋅72⋅58 |
|
Logarithms with GP as argument |
S1 = 100, 105, 110... ; S2 = 100, 95, 90...; find sum of Ai*Bi for n = 1 to 20 |
|
Determinant / Function |
P(0) = 2, P(1)+P(2)=4; determinant problems |
|
Coordinate Geometry |
Slope of straight lines; circles intercepts & radius |
|
Integral Solution |
7m + 11n = 200, minimum value of m+n |
|
Races |
Two persons running around a track, time to meet in 3 hours |
|
Polynomials |
ax² + bx + 5 leaves remainder 3 for x-1, remainder 2 for x+1, find a+b |
|
Logic based set |
Expedition/explorer group formation |
|
Calculation-based DI |
Data of an e-commerce platform; 5 questions in MCQ section |
|
Age Problems |
A = 18, one-third of father's age; when will A be half of father's age |
|
Series / AP-GP |
Sum of first 21 terms of series; find m+n in a^m/b^n |
|
Logarithm Series |
Given three terms in AP, find sum of next three terms |
|
Number Properties |
Numbers >5000 with non-repeating digits divisible by 5; numbers 100–400 sum of digits = 10 divisible by 4 |
|
Quantitative Aptitude (MCQ) |
Absolute Value |
|
Age Problem |
Person 18 years old, father 3×age; find age when half father's age |
|
Remainder |
11^1011 + 1011^11 divided by 9 |
|
Coordinate Geometry |
Line through (1,3) & (5,1); another line intersects at 45°, find slope m |
|
Verbal Ability |
Reading Comprehension |
PODcast startups (6 Qs), Meta/Zuckerberg/Elon Musk (6 Qs), Philosophical (6 Qs) |
Vocabulary |
Phrasal verbs (3), Idioms (3), Fillers double & triple (6: appraise, apprise) |
|
Grammar |
Spotting error (5 Qs); subject-verb agreement, parallelism, conditional sentences |
|
ParaJumbles |
5 Qs; 2–4 sentences or 3–5 sentences each |
|
ParaCompletion |
5 Qs; middle and last blanks missing |
Below is the detailed analysis of IPMAT Rohtak 2025 including section-wise difficulty, topic-wise breakup, memory-based questions, student reactions and expected cutoffs.
The exam was overall easier compared to Indore, with Quantitative Ability being the simplest section, Logical Reasoning moderately challenging and Verbal Ability of moderate difficulty.
IPMAT Rohtak 2025 exam assessed candidates equally across three sections with no sectional time limits making time management flexible.
Below is an overview of the IPMAT Rohtak 2025 exam structure and marking scheme:
IPMAT Analysis 2025 for IPM Rohtak |
|||
Section |
No. of Questions |
Marks for Correct Answer |
Marks for Incorrect Answer |
Quantitative Ability |
40 |
+4 |
-1 |
Logical Reasoning |
40 |
+4 |
-1 |
Verbal Ability |
40 |
+4 |
-1 |
Total |
120 |
— |
— |
Students found the IPMAT Rohtak 2025 exam relatively straightforward. Most felt the Quantitative section was quite easy, while Logical Reasoning and Verbal Ability were moderately challenging for some candidates.
IPMAT Rohtak 2025 Section-wise Difficulty Level |
|
Section |
Level of Difficulty |
Quantitative Aptitude (QA) |
Easy |
Logical Reasoning (LR) |
Easy to Moderate |
Verbal Ability (VA) |
Moderate |
Student Reaction: The first reaction from students was that the paper was quite easy. Most reported attempting over 90 questions with high confidence in their accuracy. Quantitative Ability was the simplest, while Verbal Ability posed a moderate challenge.
The absence of an on-screen calculator and no time limits per section allowed students to work at their own pace. Some Logical Reasoning and Quantitative questions overlapped in content and a calendar question was repeated from IPMAT Rohtak 2024 benefiting students who practiced previous-year questions and mock tests.
Below is the detailed section-wise topic breakup of the IPMAT Rohtak 2025 exam for easy reference and preparation.
Section-wise Topic Breakup of the IPMAT Rohtak 2025 |
||
Section |
Topic |
No. of Questions |
Quantitative Aptitude |
Mensuration (cuboid, cube) |
5–6 |
Time, Speed & Distance |
4 |
|
Simplification |
4 |
|
Percentage |
3–4 |
|
Profit & Loss |
2–3 |
|
SI & CI |
3 |
|
Average |
3 (1 incorrect) |
|
Time & Work / Pipes |
2 |
|
Ratio |
2 |
|
Partnership |
2 |
|
Age |
2–3 |
|
Number System (LCM) |
1 |
|
Permutations & Combinations |
1 |
|
Probability |
1 |
|
Stock & Share |
1 |
|
Calendar |
1 |
|
Height & Distance |
1 |
|
Number Series |
1 |
|
Verbal Ability |
Reading Comprehension |
3 Passages (4Q, 4Q, 1Q) |
Grammar (Active/Passive, Tenses, Conjunctions) |
8–10 |
|
Vocabulary (Synonyms, Antonyms, Spelling, One-word, Idioms) |
8–10 |
|
Para Jumbles (Rearrangement) |
5 |
|
Logical Reasoning & DI |
Syllogisms |
5–6 |
Coded Blood Relations |
3 |
|
Direction Sense |
3 |
|
Critical Reasoning |
2–3 |
|
Inequalities |
2 |
|
Mirror Image |
2 |
|
Sitting Arrangement (linear) |
3 |
|
Circular Arrangement |
2 |
|
Cube Cutting |
1 |
|
Calendar |
1 |
|
Clocks |
1 |
|
Analogy |
2 |
|
Percentage & Average |
1 each |
|
Data Arrangement (3 sets) |
6 (2 each set) |
IPM Rohtak paper was relatively easier, enabling students to attempt more questions with confidence. Quantitative Ability was the simplest section, while Verbal Ability and Logical Reasoning required more careful analysis.
High accuracy was crucial to maximize scores due to the negative marking in MCQs. Students who practiced mocks and previous-year questions had an added advantage.
IPMAT 2025 Rohtak Good Attempt |
|
Parameter |
Expected Range / Details |
Good Attempts |
98+ questions |
Top Performers Score |
Above 110 |
General Category Cut-Off |
Likely above 375 marks |
Below is the detailed memory-based question types for IPMAT Rohtak 2025, covering Quantitative Aptitude, Verbal Ability and Logical Reasoning & Data Interpretation:
IPMAT Analysis 2025 Memory Based Question |
||
Section |
Topic / Question Type |
Details / Example Questions |
Quantitative Aptitude |
Probability |
A coin is tossed thrice. Find the probability of exactly 2 heads. |
Averages |
Average score in 10 innings; first 6 innings given, find average of last 4 innings. |
|
Mixture Problem |
Three components in ratio 1:1:2. Prices of first two and final mixture given, find price of third. |
|
Races |
Three runners A, B, C take given minutes to complete a round. Find when they meet again. |
|
Banker’s Discount |
Bill worth ₹540, true discount ₹90. Find banker’s discount. |
|
Simple Interest |
P = ₹660, A = ₹700, time = 2 yrs. Find SI for 7 yrs at same rate. |
|
Exponent/Algebra |
272/3=x27^{2/3} = x272/3=x. Find 3x. |
|
Age Problem |
Ages 8 years ago X and X+4; after 8 years ratio 6:7. Find ratio 4 years from now. |
|
Combinatorics |
28 handshakes in a party. Find number of people. |
|
Verbal Ability |
Reading Comprehension |
3 passages: 4 Q, 4 Q, 1 Q. Mix of opinion & factual tone. |
Grammar |
Active/Passive (2), Tenses & SVA fill-in (2), Conjunctions (2–3), Sentence Correction (3) |
|
Vocabulary |
Analogies (2–3), Spelling (2; e.g., Etiquette, Diarrhoea), One-word substitution (1), Synonyms/Antonyms (4), Idioms & Phrases (3; e.g., “In apple-pie order”) |
|
Para Jumbles |
5 Questions, rearranging jumbled sentences logically |
|
Logical Reasoning & DI |
Arrangements |
3 sets from arrangements, 1 flat arrangement (7 people on floors), 1 hexagonal arrangement, 1 floor-based |
Overlap with QA |
Some questions from QA appeared in LR and vice versa |