
Case law-based questions are an integral part of the Haryana Assistant District Attorney (ADA) examination. Along with a thorough understanding of the Bare Acts, candidates are expected to be familiar with landmark Supreme Court and High Court judgments that explain important legal principles.
The Haryana ADA 2026 case law compilation includes 100 important one-liner case laws and subject-wise landmark judgments covering all major law subjects. Instead of memorising lengthy citations, candidates should focus on understanding the ratio decidendi and legal principles laid down in each case.
The Haryana ADA case law compilation includes some of the most important judgments frequently referred to during preparation. These one-liner case laws are intended to help candidates quickly revise landmark legal principles across different subjects. The following important judgments are part of the Haryana ADA case law compilation:
|
Case Law |
Key Principle |
|
Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan |
A decree passed by a court lacking jurisdiction is a complete nullity. |
|
State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain |
Applied the principle of constructive res judicata under the CPC. |
|
Daryao v. State of U.P. |
The principle of res judicata applies to writ petitions under Articles 32 and 226. |
|
Order VII Rule 11 CPC Case |
Courts must reject a plaint if clever drafting merely creates an illusion of a cause of action. |
|
Kailash v. Nankhu |
The 90-day period for filing a written statement is directory, not mandatory. |
|
Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer |
Laid down the principles governing the admissibility of electronic evidence. |
|
Sarala Mudgal v. Union of India |
Conversion to Islam does not automatically dissolve an existing Hindu marriage. |
|
Lily Thomas v. Union of India |
Religious conversion cannot be used to evade a valid subsisting Hindu marriage. |
|
Mahbub Shah v. Emperor |
Explained the distinction between common intention and similar intention. |
|
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor |
Clarified the scope of common intention under Section 34 IPC. |
|
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab |
Established the "rarest of rare" doctrine for awarding the death penalty. |
|
Hussainara Khatoon |
Landmark judgment relating to criminal procedure and the right to a speedy trial. |
|
CBI v. Anupam K. Kulkarni |
Important judgment relating to police custody and remand under criminal procedure law. |
Candidates can also refer to the detailed YouTube session below, where each judgment is explained along with its legal principle and exam relevance.
Along with the one-liner revision list, candidates should also revise landmark judgments subject-wise to strengthen their conceptual understanding. The following are some of the most important case laws across the major law subjects covered in the Haryana ADA syllabus
Important judgments on jurisdiction, res judicata, plaint rejection, written statements, and specific performance.
Cases covering electronic evidence, confessions, circumstantial evidence, and admissibility of evidence.
Leading judgments on offer and acceptance, consideration, free consent, and contractual obligations.
Important judgments explaining partnership, mutual agency, and partner liability.
Cases related to ownership of goods, sale contracts, and rights of buyers and sellers.
Important judgments on marriage, divorce, maintenance, guardianship, adoption, and succession.
Landmark judgments covering maintenance, divorce, marriage, and inheritance.
Leading criminal law judgments on common intention, culpable homicide, murder, and sentencing.
Important judgments relating to FIR registration, arrest, investigation, and procedural safeguards.
Preparing case laws for the Haryana ADA examination requires a concept-based approach rather than rote memorisation. The objective is to understand the legal principle laid down in each judgment and identify the statutory provision to which it relates.
Since many questions are principle-based, regular revision and application of case laws are equally important. Follow these preparation tips to improve your retention and exam performance:
Understand the legal principle of every case instead of memorising lengthy facts or complete citations.
Study case laws alongside the relevant Bare Acts so that you can connect judicial interpretations with statutory provisions.
Revise subject-wise landmark judgments after completing each law subject to strengthen conceptual understanding.
Solve case law-based practice questions and mock tests to learn how judgments are framed in objective examinations.
Revise repeatedly instead of learning new cases at the last minute, as multiple revisions help retain important judgments more effectively.
Explore the Judiciary Online Coaching 2026 to access essential resources for Judiciary exam preparation, including detailed insights and strategies. Dive into the Judiciary 2026 for structured courses and focused study plans designed to help aspirants excel in their exams.