
Practising full-length mock tests is one of the most effective ways to prepare for the Punjab ADA 2026 examination. They help candidates assess their preparation, improve accuracy, and become familiar with the types of questions likely to appear in the exam.
This Punjab ADA 2026 Full Length Mock Test features the most expected questions from BNSS, BNS, CPC, the Constitution of India, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, Punjab-specific Acts, Punjab General Knowledge, Computer Awareness, and Current Affairs.
The following questions are based on important legal provisions, landmark judgments, Punjab-specific laws, General Knowledge, and current affairs discussed during the session. Practising these questions can help improve conceptual clarity and exam readiness.
Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and another, (2025)
Mehra Shah v. State of UP and another, (2025)
Rajesh Kumar v. State of WB and another, (2025)
None of the above
Answer: Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and another, (2025)
This is the actual Supreme Court ruling (2025 INSC 1288), decided on 6 November 2025 by CJI B.R. Gavai and Justice A.G. Masih. The Supreme Court held that the grounds of arrest must be communicated in writing to the arrestee in the language he/she understands, and set the "two-hour prior to remand production" benchmark described in the question. The other case names appear to be distractors/fictional variants of the same real case.
A. Section 63
B. Section 64
C. Section 65
D. Section 68
Answer: A β Section 63
Section 63, BNSS 2023 (corresponding to old Section 61, CrPC) prescribes the "Form of summons" β requiring every summons issued by a Court to be in writing, in duplicate, signed by the presiding officer, and bearing the seal of the Court.
A. Section 2(1)(a)
B. Section 2(1)(g)
C. Section 2(1)(i)
D. Section 2(1)(p)
Answer: C β Section 2(1)(i)
Section 2(1)(i), BNSS 2023 defines "electronic communication" as the communication of any written, verbal, pictorial information, or video content transmitted or transferred (whether from one person to another or to a group of persons) through mail, messaging (SMS/MMS), courier, social media, email, or any other digital medium.
A. The number of sureties
B. The amount in which the sureties are bound
C. The time at which the accused person is required to attend the court
D. All of the above
Answer: D β All of the above
Under Section 79/80, BNSS (corresponding to old Section 71, CrPC β endorsement of bailable warrant), when a Court issues a warrant of arrest, it can endorse or direct that if the person executes a bond with sufficient sureties, they may be released β and the endorsement must state the number of sureties, the amount in which they and the person are respectively bound, and the time at which the person is to attend the court. All three details listed are indeed part of the requirement.
A. XXIV
B. XXV
C. XXVI
D. XXVII
Answer: C β XXVI
Chapter XXVI of the BNSS, 2023, titled "General Provisions as to Inquiries and Trials," covers provisions like place of inquiry/trial, power to transfer cases, and related procedural matters common to both inquiries and trials under the Sanhita.
A. Section 341
B. Section 342
C. Section 343
D. Section 345
Answer: C β Section 343
Section 343, BNSS 2023 (corresponding to old Section 306, CrPC) empowers the Chief Judicial Magistrate or a Metropolitan Magistrate to tender a pardon to an accomplice/accused person, on condition of their making a full and true disclosure of the whole circumstances of the offence, with a view to obtaining their evidence against other accused persons.
A. Section 2(r)
B. Section 2(wa)
C. Section 2(t)
D. Section 2(b)
Answer: B β Section 2(wa)
Section 2(wa), CrPC (inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2008, w.e.f. 31.12.2009) defines "victim" as a person who has suffered loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged, and includes their guardian or legal heir.
A. To recall any witness(es) already examined
B. To summon any witness who has been cited as a witness but not produced or examined before the evidence is closed
C. To summon any witness who has not been cited as a witness
D. All the above
Answer: D β All the above
Section 311, CrPC gives the Court very wide discretionary power at any stage of an inquiry, trial, or other proceeding β it may summon any person as a witness, examine any person in attendance (even if not summoned), or recall and re-examine any person already examined, if their evidence appears essential to the just decision of the case.
This covers all three scenarios listed: recalling an already-examined witness, summoning a cited-but-not-yet-produced witness, and summoning an entirely new, uncited witness.