SC Seeks Feedback on 3-Year Practice Rule for PwD Judiciary Aspirants

The Supreme Court heard an explanation on January 15, 2026, on the 3-year mandatory practice for PwD candidates. It is regarding the fact that the rule is especially unfair for PwD candidates. Many senior advocates and law chambers are, unfortunately, hesitant to hire PwD juniors. It makes it nearly impossible for these graduates to complete the required three years of practice. 

• Practical Barrier to Gaining Experience: The argument stated that senior advocates and law chambers, in district courts, High Courts, or the Supreme Court, do not hire PwD candidates as juniors.

• Inability to Fulfil the Mandate: It creates a significant practical barrier. It is difficult for PwD graduates to complete the required three years of practice. This was presented as a genuine and substantial hardship.

Chief Justice of India's Observations and Directives

Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s approach to this case has been notably empathetic. Rather than just looking at the law books, the Court is looking at the human impact:

• Valuing the Student Voice: The CJI  mentioned that the current rule is "demoralising" for fresh graduates. He has urged senior lawyers to "be the voice of the youth," acknowledging that those entering the profession today face different challenges than those who started decades ago.

• Seek Feedback:  Court isn't just asking other judges for their opinion. They have reached out to law universities and National Law Schools (NLUs) to get feedback from the people actually teaching and mentoring the next generation of lawyers.

• The Clock is Ticking: This isn’t a case that will sit on a shelf for years. The Court has set a four-week deadline for all feedback to be submitted. It is to understand the urgency for students planning their careers.

Myth vs. Fact: Current Status of the Rule

Myth: The three-year practice rule has been removed.

Fact: The rule has not been removed. The legal process is ongoing, with the Supreme Court currently in a phase of hearing and feedback collection. The final decision and order are still pending.

Guidance for Judiciary Aspirants

• Do not stop your preparation. The rule is not yet removed, and preparation for judicial services must continue without diversion.

• Keep track of official notifications.

• PwD candidates are advised to keep their necessary documentation and eligibility proofs ready.