CLAT Statement & Conclusion Practice Questions & Answers for CLAT 2027

CLAT Statement & Conclusion Practice Questions & Answers are important for aspirants preparing for CLAT 2027. It holds significant weight in the exam and plays an important role in improving your overall score.

These questions are designed to test your ability to analyze given information carefully, avoid assumptions, and draw conclusions that logically follow from the statements. This not only strengthens your exam performance but also builds essential skills required in legal studies.

With the right approach, clarity of concepts, and regular practice, this section can become a highly scoring area for CLAT aspirants.

What are the Statement and Conclusion Questions for CLAT 2027?

Statement and Conclusion questions are based on logical reasoning, where a statement is given followed by one or more conclusions.

Your task is to:

• Identify which conclusion logically follows from the statement

• Avoid assumptions or external knowledge

• Rely only on the information provided in the statement

Key points to understand:

• Some conclusions are direct and easy

• Some are indirect and tricky

• Sometimes all, some, or none of the conclusions may follow

The main goal is to test your analytical thinking and interpretation skills, similar to how arguments are evaluated in legal scenarios.

Types of Statement and Conclusion Questions for CLAT 2027

There are mainly two types of questions in this section:

1. One Statement with Two Conclusions

• A single statement is followed by two conclusions

• You must decide which conclusion logically follows

Example:

Statement: Yoga and meditation are good for health.

Conclusions:

1. All healthy people do yoga and meditation

2. Doing yoga is more beneficial than meditation

Answer: (d) Neither follows

Explanation: The statement does not guarantee that all healthy people follow yoga, nor does it compare yoga and meditation.

2. Multiple Statements with Conclusions

• Two or more statements are given

• You must analyze all statements together before concluding

Example:

Statements:

• External happiness is temporary

• True happiness comes from within

Conclusions:

1. Happiness does not come from outside

2. Cinema is not a lasting source of happiness

Answer: (b) Only conclusion 2 follows

Explanation: The statements imply external happiness is temporary, supporting conclusion 2.

Tips & Tricks to Solve Statement and Conclusion Questions for CLAT 2027

Follow these proven strategies to improve accuracy:

• Treat statements as absolutely true, even if unrealistic

• Do not assume anything beyond the given data

• Look for common keywords between statement and conclusion

• Ensure conclusions are logically connected to the statement

• Avoid conclusions that are too extreme or generalized

• Carefully read the statement before answering

• Avoid guessing due to negative marking

Consistency in applying these tips can significantly improve your performance.

Solved Sample Statement and Conclusion Questions for CLAT 2027

Here are a few sample questions based on statements and conclusion topics.

(a) If only conclusion 1 follows

(b) If only conclusion 2 follows

(c) If both follow

(d) If neither follows

Q1. Statements: In a one-day cricket match, the team scored 200 runs. ASpinners scored a total of 160 runs

Conclusions: 

• We have 80% spinners on our team.

• The opening batsman was a spinner.

Solution: (d) If neither follows

As stated above, the statement indicates that 8spinners made 80% of all runs, so one does not follow. There is no mention of the opening batsman in the statement, so the second cannot be inferred.

Q2. Statements: 

• India is becoming more industrialized.

• The problem of pollution is a result of industrialization.

Conclusions: 

• The nations with the most pollution are industrialized.

• There is a possibility that India will become polluted.

Solution: (b) If only conclusion 2 follows

Conclusion 2 is correct because it discusses the possibility of India becoming polluted due to industrialization. Conclusion I is invalid as no mention of pollution has been made.

Q3. Statements:

• The Internet is an interconnected network of computers.

• Input and output devices are present on all computers.

Conclusions: 

• The internet is an output device

• A single computer cannot create the internet.

Solution: (b) If only conclusion 2 follows

Only conclusion 2 follows since the internet must have computer connections on at least two computers. All computers having input and output devices does not make the internet necessarily an output device.

Q4. Statements: The employees of Green Chillies Pvt Limited. Work six days a week, while Yellow Mustard Private Limited workers work five days per week. Both companies have a nine-hour workday.

Conclusions: 

• Green chilies Pvt. Ltd. employees. Work more than the employees of Yellow Mustard Pvt.

• Green Chillies Pvt. Ltd. employees. Get paid more than the employees working at Yellow Mustard Pvt.

Solution: (a) If only conclusion 1 follows

Green Chillies employees work 54 hours per week, while Yellow Mustard employees only work 45 hours. Therefore, (I) follows logically. 

We are not provided with any information about the salary/remuneration paid at each of the aforementioned firms. Therefore, (II) does not follow.

Q5. Statements: Sachin was humiliated in front of his colleagues by the manager.

Conclusions: 

• Sachin was unpopular with his colleagues. Sachin's manager didn't like him.

• solution: (d) If neither follows

Sachin's manager might have humiliated him not because he disliked him, but because he was negligent. Therefore, I do not follow. Moreover, it is also impossible to determine Sachin's relationship with his colleagues from this statement. Therefore, II also does not follow.

Q6. Statements: In Japan, the incidence of stomach cancer is very high, while that of bowel cancer is very low. When the Japanese immigrate to Hawaii, this is reversed - the rate of bowel cancer increases but the rate of stomach cancer is reduced in the next generation. All of this is related to nutrition - the diets of Japanese in Hawaii are different than those in Japan.

Conclusions:

I. The same diet as in Hawaii should be propagated in Japan also.

II. Bowel cancer is less severe than stomach cancer.

• A. Only conclusion I follow

• B. Only conclusion II follows

• C. Either I or II follows

• D. Neither I nor II follows

• E. Both I and II follow

Solution: (d) Neither I nor II follows

Q7. Statements: Women's organizations in India have welcomed the amendment of the Industrial Employment Rules 1946 to curb sexual harassment in the workplace.

Conclusions:

I. Sexual harassment of women in the workplace is more prevalent in India as compared to other developed countries.

II. Many organizations in India will stop recruiting women to avoid such problems.

• A. Only conclusion I follow 

• B. Only conclusion II follows

• C. Either I or II follows

• D. Neither I nor II follows

• E. Both I and II follow

The correct option is D: The fact that a certain rule has been more welcomed in a certain country does not imply that the problem is more prevalent there. So, I do not follow. Also, the amendment seeks to discourage only sexual harassment of women and shall in no way discourage the employment of women. So, II also does not follow.