
The Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) has fundamentally altered its NEET SS 2025 counselling process following a landmark Delhi High Court intervention. In a decision that reshapes the eligibility and participation framework for Super Specialty postgraduate medical seats, the court directed MCC to allow petitioner candidates excluded from Round 1 to re-register and compete in Round 2.
This reversal, announced through an official MCC notice on August 5, 2026, marks a critical turning point for thousands of aspirants who believed their counselling journey had ended.
On August 5, 2026, the Delhi High Court passed a pivotal order in Writ Petition (C) No. 11097/2026, Sunil & Anr. vs Medical Counselling Committee. The bench observed that the original MCC notification dated August 3, 2026—which had excluded certain petitioner candidates—violated principles of natural justice and fair procedure.
The court's key direction: All petitioner candidates must be permitted to re-register and participate in Round 2 of NEET SS 2025 counselling.
In compliance with this order, MCC immediately withdrew its August 3, 2026 notification effective from August 5, 2026. This is significant because it demonstrates judicial intervention in real-time counselling processes—a rare occurrence that protects candidate rights during active admissions.
To understand the reversal, you need to know why MCC issued the contested notification in the first place. The August 3 notice attempted to clarify eligibility criteria for Round 2 participation, including specifications about petitioner candidate status and registration prerequisites.
However, affected candidates challenged this notification as arbitrary and discriminatory. Their argument: the notice imposed undisclosed eligibility conditions that weren't part of the original counselling information brochure released before Round 1. The Delhi High Court found merit in this contention and directed a course correction.
The NEET SS 2025 counselling timeline has been reset. Here are the exact dates for Round 2:
Resignation Portal
Opens: August 6, 2026
Closes: 4:00 PM on August 7, 2026 (This is non-negotiable—mark it in your calendar)
Purpose: Candidates who accepted seats in Round 1 or earlier rounds can resign before Round 2
Round 2 Registration & Choice Filling
Begins: 10:00 AM on August 9, 2026
Eligible candidates: All candidates who participated in NEET SS 2025, including newly re-registered petitioner candidates
Duration: MCC will publish the detailed end date on its official website
Key Point: The revised counselling schedule PDF is hosted on the official MCC CDN server. Candidates must cross-reference dates with the official MCC website (mcc.nic.in) before taking any action.
Following the Delhi High Court's direction, all petitioner candidates who were excluded from earlier rounds are now eligible to re-register. This includes:
Candidates whose registrations were rejected based on the August 3 notice
Candidates who filed petitions challenging their exclusion
Candidates who fall under the "petitioner candidate" classification as defined in the original NEET SS 2025 information brochure
What Does "Petitioner Candidate" Mean? A petitioner candidate is typically defined as someone who challenges an administrative decision through legal recourse (writ petition, arbitration, or similar judicial process). The exact definition appears in the NEET SS 2025 information brochure.
Candidates who are unsure of their status should email the MCC or check the official website for clarification before Round 2 begins.
If you accepted a seat in an earlier round of NEET SS 2025 counselling, you have two options:
Stay with Your Current Seat: Do nothing. Your seat allocation remains valid.
Participate in Round 2: Use the resignation portal (open until August 7, 4 pm) to relinquish your current seat and compete in Round 2. This is risky if you don't secure an allocation in Round 2, so weigh this carefully.
The resignation facility was extended specifically to allow candidates to make this choice after the Delhi High Court's intervention.
This order establishes several important legal precedents:
Judicial Review of Counselling Processes: The court demonstrated that even real-time, ongoing counselling cannot bypass natural justice principles. Candidates have the right to challenge arbitrary eligibility criteria.
Transparency in Admissions: The court emphasized that eligibility conditions must be disclosed upfront in the information brochure—they cannot be imposed retroactively through notices mid-counselling.
Candidate Protection: This order protects future NEET SS candidates from similar administrative decisions that lack procedural fairness.
