RRB Group D Reasoning Data Sufficiency by Deepak Sir

Data Sufficiency is an important topic in competitive exams and is commonly asked in reasoning sections of RRB Group D. These questions test your ability to analyze information rather than perform lengthy calculations. The main focus is to decide whether the given statements provide enough data to answer a question, not to find the actual answer. 

A logical and step-by-step approach is essential, where each statement is evaluated individually and then together if needed. Strong conceptual clarity, careful reading, and logical thinking help in eliminating unnecessary calculations and arriving at the correct conclusion efficiently.

Also Read: 

• RRB Group D Reasoning Blood Relation
• RRB Group D Reasoning Clock

RRB Group D Reasoning Data Sufficiency

In a Data Sufficiency problem, a question is presented, followed by two or more statements containing data. The primary objective is not to find the final answer to the question, but to determine whether the data provided in the statements is sufficient to answer it.

Illustrative Example:

• Question: How many students are in the class?

• Statement 1: The number of students is an even number.

• Statement 2: The number is divisible by 3 and is between 31 and 40.

Analysis:

1. Statement 1 Alone: Knowing the number is even (e.g., 2, 4, 6,…) does not provide a specific count. Thus, Statement 1 is not sufficient.

2. Statement 2 Alone: Numbers between 31 and 40 divisible by 3 are 33, 36, and 39. Multiple possibilities mean the exact number cannot be determined. Thus, Statement 2 is not sufficient.

3. Combining Both Statements: From Statement 2, the possibilities are 33, 36, or 39. Statement 1 requires the number to be even. The only number satisfying both conditions is 36. Combining the data leads to a unique answer.

Conclusion: Both statements together are sufficient to answer the question.

Methodology for Solving Data Sufficiency Problems

A strict, step-by-step approach is essential for accurately solving Data Sufficiency problems. The most critical rule involves evaluating each statement independently before considering its combination.

Principle of Independent Evaluation

• When evaluating Statement 1, you must not use any information from Statement 2.

• Similarly, when evaluating Statement 2, you must completely disregard all information provided in Statement 1.

• A common error is carrying over information from one statement when analyzing the other, which often leads to incorrect conclusions.

Principle of Combined Evaluation

• You should only attempt to combine information from both statements if neither statement is sufficient on its own.

• If combining the data results in a single, definite answer, then the conclusion is "Both statements together are sufficient."

Standard Answer Options

The goal is to select one of the following conclusions:

1. Only Statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question.

2. Only Statement 2 is sufficient to answer the question.

3. Both statements together are sufficient, but neither is sufficient alone.

4. Either Statement 1 or Statement 2 is sufficient on its own.

5. Neither Statement 1 nor Statement 2 is sufficient, even when combined.

Worked Examples in Data Sufficiency

Data Sufficiency problems can cover various academic topics, including ordering, coding-decoding, and puzzles. The underlying logic of sufficiency remains consistent across all types.

Example 1: Ordering (Arun's Leave)

• Question: On which day does Arun take his leave?

• Statement 1: Arun does not take leave on Wednesday. (Insufficient)

• Statement 2: Arun took his leave either on Monday or on Thursday. (Insufficient, as it does not provide an exact day).

• Combined: Even combined, the day could be Monday or Thursday. This is not a single, definite answer.

• Conclusion: Neither statement is sufficient.

Example 2: Ordering (Eldest Person)

• Question: Who is the eldest among T, V, and W?

• Statement 1: T is elder than W (T > W). (Insufficient)

• Statement 2: W is the elder sister of V (W > V). (Insufficient)

• Combined: Combining yields T > W > V. From this, T is definitely the eldest.

• Conclusion: Both statements together are sufficient.

Example 3: Coding-Decoding ("never")

• Question: In a code language, how is the word "never" written?

• Statement 1: Never ever go there is coded.

• Statement 2: go there and come is coded.

• Analysis: "go there" is common, so its code can be found. However, in Statement 1, "never" and "ever" remain, and their individual codes cannot be isolated.

• Conclusion: Even when combined, the statements are not sufficient.

Example 4: Floor Puzzle

• Question: On which floor does C live in a five-story building (floor 1 is the lowest)?

• Statement 1: A lives on a floor below D, who lives on the topmost floor. (D is on floor 5; insufficient for C).

• Statement 2: E lives two floors above C. C does not live on the 3rd or 2nd floor.

• Analysis: The arrangement is E _ C (a block of 3 floors). If C were on floor 2 or 3, it would be ruled out by the condition. The only way for the E _ C block to fit is if C is on floor 1, making E on floor 3.

• Conclusion: Only Statement 2 is sufficient.

Example 5: Coding-Decoding ("sun")

• Question: What is the code for "sun"?

• Statement 1: gun is coded as hun, and tun is coded as uun.

• Logic: The pattern is to increment the first letter by one (+1) and keep the rest. Applying this to sun gives tun. (Sufficient)

• Statement 2: The sun rises in the east. (Irrelevant, Insufficient).

• Conclusion: Only Statement 1 is sufficient.

Example 6: Ranking ("Heaviest Person")

• Question: Among six people, who is the heaviest?

• Statement 1: P is lighter than S, who is lighter than R (R > S > P). (Insufficient)

• Statement 2: R is lighter than only T.

• Analysis: This phrase means T is the only person heavier than R. Thus, T is the heaviest person.

• Conclusion: Only Statement 2 is sufficient.

Example 7: Coding-Decoding ("dear")

• Question: Given My Dear Family is coded as 2 6 4, find the code for "dear".

• Statement 1: My Small Family is coded as 2 6 5.

• Analysis: Comparing My Dear Family (2 6 4) and My Small Family (2 6 5), My Family corresponds to 2 6. This leaves Dear = 4 and Small = 5. (Sufficient)

• Statement 2: Dear Family Friend is coded with some values. (Insufficient to isolate "dear" without more specific codes).

• Conclusion: Only Statement 1 is sufficient.

Example 8: Ranking ("Highest Payment")

• Question: Among P, N, K, and J, who received the highest payment?

• Statement 1: P earns more than K and J (P > K, P > J). (Insufficient)

• Statement 2: N earns more than K (N > K). (Insufficient)

• Combined: We know P > K, P > J, and N > K. However, there is no comparison between P and N. We cannot definitively determine who earns the most.

• Conclusion: Both statements together are not sufficient.