Arbitration Law Preparation Strategy and Study Plan for CLAT PG 2025: Arbitration Law in India deals with resolving disputes between two parties with the help of an arbitrator outside the court. It is a legal technique, in which the respective parties refer to another person, known as arbitrator, to resolve the dispute. His decision is final and the disputed parties have to comply with it. The Arbitration Law Preparation Strategy and Study Plan for CLAT PG 2025 will entail all the important topics regarding arbitration law in India.
Arbitration Law Preparation Strategy and Study Plan for CLAT PG 2025, Exam Pattern |
Particulars | Details |
Total Questions in CLAT Exam | 120 questions |
Marks allotted | 1 mark for each question |
Question Type | Objective |
Important Topics | Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, and other law subjects |
Arbitration Law Preparation Strategy and Study Plan for CLAT PG 2025, Important Topics |
Topics | Syllabus |
Section 89 of CPC |
|
Section 2 (1) |
|
Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1966 |
|
Other Arbitration Laws |
|
Section 2 (1)b |
|
Arbitration Law Preparation Strategy |
Preparation Strategy | Explanation |
Comprehend Principles and Concepts |
|
Reference Books |
|
Practice Questions and Understand the Pattern |
|
Time-management |
|
CLAT PG 2025 Study Plan, Analysis, and Categorization |
Study Plan | Explanation |
Months 1-3: Grasping the basics of Arbitration Law |
|
Months 4-6: Attempt Mocks and Self-Analyze |
|
Months 7-8: Review and Practice |
|
Months 10-12: Revision of Current Affairs |
|
Important Arbitration Law Judgments for CLAT PG 2025 |
Arbitration Law Judgements | Issues | Judgements | Provisions Involved |
Bharat Aluminum Co vs Kaiser Aluminum Technical Service (2012) | The main issue revolved around the jurisdiction of Indian Courts over arbitration proceedings and awards in agreements that chose foreign seat of arbitration. | According to Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Supreme Court stated that the provisions for the conduct of arbitration and challenging of awards, would only apply to arbitration that provide their seat in India. In effect, Indian courts would not have jurisdiction over foreign-seated arbitration. | The provisions involved were Section 2(2), 9, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. |
Amlegals vs Raahi Automation Solutions Pvt. LTD. (2021) | The parties could still refer their disputes to arbitration in the absence of the arbitration clause. | The Gujarat High Court gave reference to arbitration, despite the absence of an arbitration clause between the parties. The Court stated that the decision was based on the correspondence between the parties, which clearly showed their intent to arbitrate their disputes. | The important provision involved was Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which defines the “Arbitration Agreement”. |
M/s N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Indo Unique Flame Ltd. and others | It involved knowing whether a contract of guarantee would be classified as an agreement providing for arbitration. | According to the Supreme Court, a bank guarantee, independent of its underlying contract, cannot be considered as an agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Thereby, any dispute arising out of such a guarantee cannot be categorized as arbitration. | The involved provision was an interpretation of Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which defines the “Arbitration Agreement”. |