

Phrenology Interpreting the Mind Reading Answers: Phrenology Interpreting the Mind is an IELTS reading passage that challenges your understanding of historical scientific theories and their evolution. The passage explores how phrenology, once considered a valid science, claimed to interpret psychological traits by examining skull shapes. When approaching the IELTS reading passage on Phrenology Interpreting the Mind, it’s essential to focus on the names, theories, and experimental methods discussed, as well as the criticisms that led to its eventual dismissal.
This passage is useful for practicing how to deal with texts that mix historical context with scientific critique. If you are wondering how to solve IELTS reading passage on Phrenology interpreting the mind, the key lies in identifying main ideas, understanding researcher roles, and matching viewpoints.
Free IELTS Reading Practice Tests
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-14, which are based on the Reading Passage below.
Phrenology is the doctrine that proposes that psychological traits of personality, intellect, temperament, and character are ascertainable from analysis of the protrusions and depressions in the skull. It was an idea created by Franz Joseph Gall in 1796. Gall referred to his new idea in English as cranioscopy. It was only later that Johanne Spurzheim, one of Gall’s students, labeled the idea phrenology after Gall’s death. Gall’s idea was spurred when he noticed that university classmates who could memorize great amounts of information with relative ease seemed to have prominent eyes and large foreheads. He speculated that other internal qualities, besides memory, might be indicated by an external feature also. Gall theorized that traits were located in particular regions of the brain. Enlargements or expressions in the brain in particular areas meant a greater than normal or less than normal quantity of the given trait. It was assumed that the external contour of the skull accurately reflected the external contour of the brain where traits were localized.
Carl Cooter, another advocate of phrenology asserted that there were five major parts to phrenology theory. The first was simply that the brain was the organ of the mind. The second was that the brain was not a homogeneous unity, but a compilation of mental organs with specific functions. The third was that the organs were topographically localized. The fourth was that the relative size of any one of the organs could be taken as a measure of that organ’s power over the person’s behavior. The fifth and final part of Cooter’s theory was that external craniological features could be used to diagnose the internal state of the mental faculties. All of these parts were based on observations Cooter made.
Sebastian Leibl, a student of Cooter’s, theorized that there could be anywhere from 27 to 38 regions on the skull indicative of the organs of the brain, each of which stood for a different personality characteristic. Leibl further theorized that the different regions of the brain would grow or shrink with usage, just as muscles will grow larger when exercised. If a certain part of the brain grew from increased use, the skull covering that part of the brain would bulge out to make room for the expanded brain tissue. With these assumptions, the bumps on one’s skull could be felt and the abilities and personality traits of a person could be assessed.
Spurzheim put a more metaphysical and philosophical spin on Gall’s concept when he named it phrenology, meaning “science of the mind”. To Spurzheim phrenology was the science that could tell people what they are and why exactly they are who they are. Spurzheim wrote that the premise of phrenology was to use the methods to identify individuals who stood out at both poles of society: those with a propensity for making important social contributions and those with a greater than the normal tendency for evil. The former was to be encouraged, nurtured, and developed in order to maximize their potential for good. The latter needed to be curbed and segregated to protect society from their predisposition to be harmful to others.
Phrenology has met up with a good deal of criticism since it was proposed, but over time it has also been credited for certain things. John Fancher, a critic of phrenology, states that it was a curious mixture, combining some keen observations and insights with an inappropriate scientific procedure. Most criticism is aimed at the poor methods used by phrenologists and the tangent from the standard scientific procedure in investigating.
Pierre Flourens was also appalled by the shoddy methods of phrenologists and was determined to study the functions of the brain strictly by experiment. The specific technique that Flourens used was ablation, the surgical removal of certain small parts of the brain. Flourens was a very skilled surgeon and used ablation to cleanly excise certain slices from the brain. He ablated precisely determined portions of bird, rabbit, and dog brains. Flourens then observed the behavior of his subject. Since, for obvious ethical reasons, he was only able to use animals, he could not test uniquely human faculties. He never tested or measured any behavior until he nursed his subjects back to health after their operations. Flourens’s subjects did show a lowering of all functions but not just one function as Gall’s theory would have predicted. Gall asserted that he wiped out many organs all at once when he ablated part of the brain. This explained the general lowering of all functions in many of his subjects. Despite attacks from Flourens and others, phrenology held its appeal to scientists in Europe who would bring the idea across to America where it would flourish.
Also Read:
Here are some sample IELTS questions based on the Phrenology Interpreting the Mind passage:
Who coined the term “phrenology”?
What did Gall notice about his classmates?
What were the five parts of Carl Cooter’s theory?
What assumption did Leibl make about the brain and skull?
What was Spurzheim’s interpretation of phrenology?
How did Flourens test Gall’s theory?
What technique did Flourens use in his experiments?
What was the result of Flourens’s experiments?
Who was Sebastian Leibl?
Why did critics object to phrenology?
IELTS Reading Answer to Questions 1-10 with explanations:
|
Question |
Answer |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Who coined the term “phrenology”? |
Johanne Spurzheim |
The passage states that Spurzheim, a student of Gall, named the idea phrenology after Gall’s death. |
|
2. What did Gall notice about his classmates? |
They had prominent eyes and large foreheads. |
Gall noticed that students with good memory had these physical traits, leading to his theory. |
|
3. What were the five parts of Carl Cooter’s theory? |
Brain as mind’s organ, multiple mental organs, localized functions, organ size relates to power, skull shape reflects brain. |
The passage clearly outlines all five points under Cooter’s section. |
|
4. What assumption did Leibl make about the brain and skull? |
The skull bulges where brain regions grow. |
Leibl believed that exercised brain regions grow like muscles, affecting skull shape. |
|
5. What was Spurzheim’s interpretation of phrenology? |
A method to identify both good and evil tendencies in people. |
Spurzheim gave a moral and philosophical view of phrenology as a way to classify societal contributors and threats. |
|
6. How did Flourens test Gall’s theory? |
By removing parts of animal brains and observing behavior. |
He used the ablation technique to test the effects of brain removal. |
|
7. What technique did Flourens use in his experiments? |
Ablation |
The passage clearly states that he surgically removed brain parts using this technique. |
|
8. What was the result of Flourens’s experiments? |
General lowering of all functions |
This contradicted Gall’s view that only specific traits would be affected. |
|
9. Who was Sebastian Leibl? |
A student of Cooter who theorized about 27–38 skull regions |
The passage introduces Leibl as expanding on the number of personality-related skull areas. |
|
10. Why did critics object to phrenology? |
Poor scientific methods |
Both Fancher and Flourens criticised the lack of proper procedures in phrenological studies. |
| IELTS Reading Band Score | IELTS Listening Band Score |
| IELTS Speaking Band Score | IELTS Writing Band Score |
Physics Wallah offers a few popular online IELTS courses for all students. Follow the latest IELTS articles to better prepare for the exam.
| IELTS Registration | IELTS Eligibility Criteria |
| IELTS Exam Pattern | IELTS Syllabus |
| IELTS Exam Dates | IDP IELTS Test Centers |