
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is India’s apex body for preventing corruption and promoting integrity in government offices. It acts as an independent watchdog that oversees vigilance activities, advises organizations on maintaining clean and transparent practices, and ensures that complaints related to corruption are examined fairly.
Established to strengthen public trust in governance, the CVC plays a key role in upholding honesty and accountability across the administrative system.
The journey of the Central Vigilance Commission from an advisory body to a statutory institution is an important development in India’s governance and anti-corruption framework.
Establishment (1964): The CVC was initially established in February 1964 by an Executive Resolution of the Central Government. This action was based on the recommendations of the Committee on Prevention of Corruption, headed by Shri K. Santhanam (Santhanam Committee). The primary objective was to advise and guide Central Government agencies in the field of vigilance.
Supreme Court's Role (1997): The status and independence of the CVC were significantly boosted by the Supreme Court’s judgment in the famous Vineet Narain & Others vs. Union of India & Another case in 1997. The court directed the Central Government to confer statutory status on the CVC to ensure its effective functioning.
Statutory Status (2003): The Parliament enacted the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, which provided the CVC with its much-needed statutory status and autonomy. This Act made the CVC an independent body, free from the control of any executive authority.
The Central Vigilance Commission is a multi-member body that ensures collective decision-making in its functioning.
The Commission consists of:
A Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC), who acts as the Chairperson.
Not more than two Vigilance Commissioners (VCs), who act as Members.
The Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioners are appointed by the President of India by a warrant under his hand and seal. This appointment is made after obtaining the recommendation of a three-member Selection Committee consisting of:
The Prime Minister (Chairperson).
The Union Minister of Home Affairs (Member).
The Leader of the Opposition in the House of the People (Lok Sabha) (Member).
The term of the CVC and VCs is fixed to protect them from arbitrary removal by the executive:
Term: The CVC and the VCs hold office for a term of four years from the date they enter office.
Age Limit: The tenure is also limited until they attain the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier.
Reappointment: The Central Vigilance Commissioner, upon ceasing to hold office, is ineligible for reappointment in the Commission. VCs are eligible for appointment as the CVC.
Further Employment: After their tenure, the members are ineligible for further employment under the Central or State Governments.
Service Conditions: The salary, allowances, and other conditions of service of the CVC are similar to those of the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), and those of the VCs are similar to the Members of the UPSC.
The President can remove the CVC or any VC from office under certain circumstances.
The removal can be on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, but only after the Supreme Court has conducted an inquiry and reported that the person should be removed. The President is bound by the advice tendered by the Supreme Court in this matter.
The President can remove them without a Supreme Court reference if they:
Are adjudged as insolvent (bankrupt).
Have been convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude.
Engage in any paid employment outside the duties of their office during their term.
Are unfit to continue in office due to mental or physical infirmity.
Acquire any financial or other interest that is likely to affect prejudicially their functions as Commissioners.
The Central Vigilance Commission is entrusted with a wide array of powers and functions to ensure a corruption-free administration.
The CVC exercises superintendence over the vigilance administration of various Central Government Ministries, Departments, and Organisations.
It advises and guides Central Government organisations in planning, executing, reviewing, and reforming their vigilance work.
It must be consulted by the Central Government before framing rules and regulations relating to vigilance and disciplinary matters concerning the members of the All-India Services and Central Services.
The CVC, while not an investigating agency itself, directs and oversees investigations:
Superintendence over CBI: It exercises superintendence over the functioning of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE), which is the investigative arm of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), but only in matters related to the investigation of offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Directing Inquiry: It can inquire or cause an inquiry to be made into any complaint of an offense committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, against certain categories of public servants. This includes:
Members of All-India Services serving in the Union.
Group 'A' officers of the Central Government.
Reviewing Progress: It reviews the progress of investigations conducted by the CBI and the progress of applications pending with competent authorities for sanction of prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Judicial Powers: The CVC has all the powers of a Civil Court while conducting any inquiry. Its proceedings have a judicial character.
Advisory Role: After an inquiry, the CVC advises the Central Government or its authorities on the course of action. While the government must consider the advice, if it decides not to agree, it must communicate its reasons for non-acceptance to the CVC.
Annual Report: The CVC submits an Annual Report on its performance to the President of India, who then lays it before each House of Parliament. This report highlights systemic failures and suggests preventive measures.
The jurisdiction of the Central Vigilance Commission extends over various entities and officials of the Central Government.
The CVC can inquire into offenses allegedly committed by the following:
Members of the All-India Services serving under the Union.
Group ‘A’ officers of the Central Government.
Officers of the specified level in Central Government authorities and organisations.
Officers of the rank of General Manager and above in Public Sector Banks (PSBs).
Officers of the specified level in statutory corporations and authorities controlled by the Central Government.
It also exercises vigilance oversight over Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and financial institutions.
The Central Vigilance Commission also acts as the nodal agency for handling whistleblower complaints.
In 2004, the Government of India authorised the CVC as the Designated Agency to receive and act on written complaints for disclosure on any allegation of corruption or misuse of office. This mechanism is officially known as the Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers (PIDPI) Resolution, popularly known as the Whistleblower Resolution. The Commission is responsible for keeping the identity of the complainant secret to protect against victimisation.
To execute its functions, the Central Vigilance Commission has a specialised structure. The Commission consists of:
|
Organisational Structure of the Central Vigilance Commission |
||
|
Wing |
Head/Composition |
Primary Functions |
|
Secretariat |
Secretary (of the rank of Additional Secretary to the GOI) and other supporting staff |
General administration and assisting the Commission in its routine work. |
|
Chief Technical Examiners' Wing (CTE) |
Two Engineers of the rank of Chief Engineers (Chief Technical Examiners) |
Technical audit of government construction works from a vigilance angle, and investigation of specific complaints related to construction. |
|
Commissioners for Departmental Inquiries (CDI) |
Commissioners (around 14 posts) in the rank of Director or Deputy Secretary |
Function as Inquiry Officers to conduct Oral Inquiries in departmental proceedings initiated against public servants. |
Despite its crucial role as the apex vigilance body, the Central Vigilance Commission faces certain limitations that affect its effectiveness.
Advisory Role: The CVC is essentially an advisory body. Central Government departments are free to either accept or reject its advice in corruption cases, provided they communicate the reasons for rejection.
Lack of Resources and Staff: The Commission has a small setup and often lacks adequate resources and staff strength compared to the sheer number of complaints it receives and the vast number of central departments it oversees.
No Power to Register Criminal Cases: The CVC deals only with vigilance or disciplinary cases. It does not have the power to register criminal cases. It relies on external agencies like the CBI for investigation.
Limited Autonomy over CBI: While the CVC has supervisory powers over the CBI concerning Prevention of Corruption Act cases, it does not have the power to call for any file from the CBI or direct it to investigate in a particular manner.
Limited Jurisdiction: Its jurisdiction is confined to central government bodies and does not extend to state government officials or departments, leaving a significant gap in the anti-corruption framework.
