Bentham and Hooker Classification, Merits and Demerits

Bentham and Hooker Classification: Taxonomy is the science of classifying both living and extinct plants and animals. Since the 17th century, various methods for classifying plants and animals have been proposed. The earliest attempt was by Aristotle, who introduced a general idea of classification. Later, Carl Linnaeus developed the Linnaean system of classification, which introduced binomial nomenclature and a hierarchical structure. This method is widely accepted internationally.

Free Study Material for NEET Preparation

NEET Exam

Bentham and Hooker System of Classification

• Dicotyledonae
• Gymnospermae
• Monocotyledonae.

Cell The Unit of Life

Characteristics of Bentham and Hooker Classification

• Natural System: This classification is based on natural similarities among plants, considering multiple characteristics for grouping.
• Genera Plantarum: The detailed classification was published in their work "Genera Plantarum" between 1862 and 1883.
• Three Primary Sections: Plants are divided into three primary groups Dicotyledons, Monocotyledons, and Gymnosperms.
• Subdivisions: Each primary group is further divided into series, orders, and families.
• Phylogenetic Elements: Although not entirely based on phylogeny, the system aims to group related families together.
• Broad Acceptance: It was one of the most widely accepted classification systems until newer phylogenetic systems based on genetic data emerged.

Sexual Reproduction in Flowering Plants

Merits of Bentham and Hooker Classification

1. Emphasis on Natural Relationships: Unlike earlier systems that grouped plants based on a single characteristic, such as the number of stamens, Bentham and Hooker used a "natural system" approach. They considered a wide range of morphological and anatomical features, especially those related to flowers and reproduction. This led to a classification that more accurately reflected the true evolutionary relationships between plant groups.
2. Practicality and Ease of Use: The system was designed to be practical for use in herbaria. Each category, from families to genera, had clear diagnostic features. These features served as a key for identification, allowing botanists to easily classify unknown plant specimens based on observable characteristics.
3. Emphasis on Accuracy: A major strength of the system was its meticulous examination of actual plant specimens. This focus on direct observation ensured a higher degree of accuracy in plant classification compared to previous systems that relied on descriptions or illustrations.
4. Logical Organization: The system divided flowering plants (angiosperms) into two major groups: monocots and dicots. Although this separation was not based on evolutionary understanding (which was not fully developed at the time), it represented a significant step forward. Placing dicots, with their more complex flower parts, after monocots was a reasonable assumption based on floral complexity.
5. Accommodation for Uncertainty: The system acknowledged uncertainty in plant relationships. Groups with unclear affinities were placed in a separate category, "Ordines anomali," allowing for future revisions as knowledge improved.
6. Detailed Descriptions: "Genera Plantarum" provided detailed descriptions of a vast number of plant genera and species. This comprehensive documentation served as a valuable resource for botanists worldwide.

Explore NEET Online Courses by PW

Demerits of Bentham and Hooker Classification

1. Non-phylogenetic approach: Developed before Darwin's theory of evolution, this system does not consider the evolutionary relationships between plants. As a result, plants with a common ancestor might be placed in different groups based only on observable traits.
2. Over-dependence on a few characteristics: The system relies heavily on a few easily observed morphological features, such as the number of cotyledons (seed leaves) in flowering plants. This can be misleading because unrelated plants might share these features due to convergent evolution. Conversely, closely related plants might differ in these features.
3. Artificial grouping: By focusing on single characteristics, the system can group unrelated plants together based on superficial similarities. For example, placing gymnosperms (cone-bearing plants) between dicotyledons and monocotyledons is controversial because gymnosperms belong to a completely different evolutionary lineage.
4. Fragmentation of families: The emphasis on specific traits can lead to the division of naturally related plant families into smaller, artificial groups. This fragmentation makes it more difficult to understand the true relationships among plants within a family.
5. Limited explanatory power: Because it does not consider evolutionary history, the Bentham and Hooker system does not explain why plants share certain characteristics. It merely categorizes them based on observable features, providing a limited understanding of plant diversity.

Comparison of Bentham and Hooker and Engler and Prantl’s System of Classification