Missing the UPSC cutoff by three marks can make the next attempt especially difficult. Pulkit Jain had already reached the interview stage and scored 160 marks, but the final result still remained three marks away. Instead of treating every attempt as a fresh start, he carried the lessons from each stage forward and gradually changed how he approached Mains, CSAT and the Interview.
After four attempts, Pulkit secured AIR 242 in UPSC. His journey included three Mains appearances and two interviews, with every attempt taking him one step further. Along the way, he learned the importance of not letting one bad paper affect the next, limiting his sources and staying focused on the preparation methods that worked for him.
Pulkit's UPSC journey had already taken him through Mains and the interview before he secured AIR 242. Across four attempts, he appeared in Mains three times and reached the interview twice.
For him, those attempts were not simply a count of failures. Each one took him closer to the final stage.
“Char attempt aisa dikhta hai ki char lag gaye, but aap process dekhen to wahi hai na. Char attempts mein teen Mains hain, do interviews hain, to every time ek step upar hi ja raha tha.”
His previous attempt came particularly close to the final result. Pulkit had scored 160 in the interview, but still missed the final cutoff by just three marks.
“Is baar thoda interview mein dar lag raha tha kyunki pichhli baar teen marks se cut off ruka tha aur interview mein 160 the.”
That three-mark gap made the next interview difficult to approach with complete calm. He knew how little had separated him from the final result.
“To teen to aise the ki ek answer bhi achha lag jaata to de dete.”
The experience became a reminder that even after reaching the final stage, every mark matters.
The setbacks were not limited to the final cutoff. Pulkit's previous Mains attempt also gave him a lesson that stayed with him throughout the next preparation cycle.
In GS Paper III, he missed a 15-marker because the question simply escaped his attention.
“Actually mera GS 3 bigad gaya tha. Mera ek question chhoot gaya tha aur bahut hi silly mistake se chhoota tha, kyunki mere dhyan se hi nikal gaya tha.”
The mistake then affected his mindset going into GS Paper IV, which was held on the same day.
“To wo spillover effect GS3 ka GS4 pe aa gaya kyunki ek hi din hota hai.”
He scored around 76 in GS Paper III after the missed question and 102 in Ethics, which he considered lower than what he expected.
The experience gave him a simple lesson for his next attempt: one difficult moment should not be allowed to affect the next paper.
His friends reinforced that advice before the next Mains and Interview.
“Is baar mere saare doston ki mujhe yahi advice thi ki Mains mein ya interview mein bhi spillover mat karna.”
That lesson became particularly relevant during his final interview. When he struggled with a basic question about his home city, he consciously prevented the mistake from affecting the rest of his performance.
“Ek bahut hi basic question tha regarding my home city only. To wo maine achhe se answer nahi kiya tha.”
Instead of carrying the mistake forward, he immediately tried to recover.
“Is baar maine spillover nahi hone diya tha. Maine turant hi apne counter measures daal diye the ki nahi sir, aisa hai, but main aisa zaroor karunga aur phir wo interview wapas se smooth ho gaya tha.”
This time, Pulkit was able to recognise the difficult moment, address it quickly and move forward without letting one uncertain answer affect the rest of his interview
After experiencing the pressure of multiple attempts, Pulkit's preparation became increasingly focused. He did not believe in collecting endless study material. Instead, he preferred short, revisable resources and sources that he already trusted.
This approach was visible in his Prelims preparation, where PW Udaan became one of his main resources.
“Sir Prelims to main simple hi rakhta tha. Main aapki hi Udaan books padhta tha kyunki bahut short hoti hain. Aur agar ek baar basics clear ho jaaye to phir aapko bulky material chahiye nahi.”
He also emphasised that this was genuinely part of his preparation.
“Aur ye main promotion ke liye nahi keh raha hoon. Main Udaan hi padhta tha Prelims mein.”
Pulkit used Udaan for almost all subjects and combined it with PYQs and current affairs.
“Pre ka to wahi hai, current affairs, PYQs aur ek basic material koi bhi, jo mere liye Udaan tha is case mein.”
His situation in the fourth attempt made this approach even more important. Since he had appeared for the interview in the previous cycle, he did not restart Prelims preparation until after the result.
“Result tak maine wapas Prelims chalu hi nahi kiya tha, to effectively ek mahina hi tha.”
With only about a month, he did not want to spend time on bulky material.
“Time hi nahi tha ki kuch bulky material lein... agar kisi ka base hai to it is sufficient for me.”
For current affairs, he used PT 365 or selected sources recommended by people he trusted. He also carried useful current-affairs information into Mains answers as examples and value additions.
Pulkit's association with PW was not limited to Udaan. His Mains preparation also included Prahar for static portions of selected subjects and the Srijan Mains Program.
For Mains, he primarily worked with his own notes and continuously added value to them.
“Mains mein to mere khud ke notes the, usmein value addition karta rehta tha main.”
He used Mains 365 and selectively referred to Prahar where he needed additional static preparation.
“Static ke liye jaise maine kuch subjects ke liye Prahar bhi ki thi, but generally Mains current-oriented zyada rakhta hoon.”
Pulkit had also joined Srijan, although he openly says that he did not use its material extensively. The mentorship component was more useful to him.
“Sir honestly speaking, maine itna use nahi kiya tha, but maine join kiya tha.”
His conversations with his mentor, Hare Krishna Sir, became an important part of that experience.
“More of we were like friends, to chatting ho jaati thi. Matlab mentorship tha, but material itna use nahi kiya tha Srijan ka.”
For Mains test practice, he focused more heavily on the Forum test series and says several questions were repeated in the actual examination.
“Maine Forum ki test series le rakhi thi, to uspe hi zyada focus tha. And sir, this time Forum se bahut question repeat hue the.”
The combination of his own notes, selected resources, test practice and mentorship allowed him to keep his preparation focused instead of constantly expanding his material.
After reaching the interview stage again, Pulkit's association with PW continued through the Interview Guidance Program.
His PW mock was conducted by Kush Verma Sir, and Pulkit found the questioning style particularly useful because it focused on depth.
“PW mein thoda depth-based zyada poochte hain. Kush Verma Sir the... to wo bhi depth-based poochte hain.”
That experience became relevant when he appeared for his final interview with Sanjay Verma Sir.
“Is baar mujhe final mein Sanjay Verma Sir the, to coincidentally unhone bhi depth-based hi poocha, to thoda overlap ho gaya tha.”
Pulkit felt that this made the final interview experience more relatable than his previous attempt.
“Last year jaise Dinesh Dasa Sir the, to wo to random poochte hain, to last year ka relatable nahi tha.”
This time, the PW mock had already exposed him to the kind of depth-based questioning he encountered in the final interview.
But the bigger difference was how he handled pressure. Despite one difficult answer about his hometown, he did not allow the mistake to affect the rest of the interview.
That was the same lesson he had learned from his previous Mains attempt: do not let one bad moment become the reason for the next one to go wrong.
Pulkit carried the same focused approach into CSAT. After CSAT became a hurdle in his 2023 attempt, he stopped trying to solve everything and concentrated on a limited number of questions.
“Uske baad se sir meri strategy bahut simple thi ki bahut limited question karna hai. Main 45 ke baad paper chhod deta tha.”
In his successful attempt, he even stopped around 15 minutes before the paper ended because he did not want to take unnecessary risks.
“Like this year maine CSAT mein 15 minute pehle hi paper band karke rakh diya tha ki koi gamble nahi karna hai.”
He focused on his stronger areas rather than spending time on topics he was less comfortable with.
“Apne strong holds pakad lo.”
That same philosophy shaped his wider preparation. Pulkit preferred to stay with sources he trusted rather than constantly changing his strategy.
“Main sources ko leke bahut rigid hoon ki agar koi mera source hai, koi kitna bhi bol de, nahi karna hai, nahi karna hai, main wahi karunga.”
His Ethics preparation followed the same principle. Instead of collecting hundreds of examples, he fixed 20 examples and focused on adapting them to different questions.
“Maine fix kar liya tha ki ye mere 20 examples hain. Main inse zyada divert nahi hounga. Inhi 20 ko kisi tarah mould karunga.”
For Pulkit, this was ultimately about revision and application rather than continuously adding more content.
“100 book padhne se achha ek hi book ko 100 baar achhe se padh liya jaaye.”
After four attempts, three Mains appearances and two interviews, that focused approach finally led to AIR 242.
“I would like to show my gratitude towards PW because kahin na kahin, bahut kahin-kahin saath to diya hai PW ne.”
Looking back at the journey, Pulkit also expressed his gratitude towards PW for the support he received at different stages.
Pulkit Jain’s journey from a three-mark setback to AIR 242 shows how every attempt can bring a new lesson, whether it comes from a missed question, exam pressure or the final interview. His story reflects the value of learning from setbacks, keeping preparation focused and carrying the right lessons forward.