One Nation One Election: India, the world's largest democracy, is in a perpetual state of elections. With 28 states, eight union territories, and nearly a billion eligible voters, the electoral process is a constant feature of the nation's political landscape. Against this backdrop, the proposal of "One Nation, One Election" (ONOE) has emerged as a contentious topic, sparking debates on its potential to revolutionize India's electoral framework and governance.
The ONOE proposal advocates for synchronized elections to the Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament) and all state legislative assemblies. This initiative aims to conduct these elections either on a single day or within a specified timeframe every five years. The idea, primarily championed by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government, is rooted in the belief that it could enhance governance efficiency, reduce electoral costs, and provide stability to the political process.
India experienced synchronized elections from 1951 to 1967, during which elections for the Lok Sabha and most State Assemblies were held simultaneously. However, this practice eroded due to political factors and premature dissolutions of assemblies. The election cycles diverged further due to political instability and defections in the 1960s.
INSIGHTS FROM HIGH-LEVEL COMMITTEE ON ONOEOn 2 September 2023, the Government of India issued a notification constituting a high-level committee to examine the issue of simultaneous elections, chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind. Other Nations with Simultaneous Elections A high-level panel studied how simultaneous elections are conducted worldwide. The panel focused on seven countries—South Africa, Sweden, Belgium, Germany, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Japan—all of which successfully conduct simultaneous elections. The Committee proposed phased implementation of ONOE:
The committee suggested 15 constitutional amendments to facilitate this transition, including the introduction of new Articles 82A and 324A, and amendments to Articles 83, 172, and 327. These changes aim to ensure the smooth execution of simultaneous elections while preserving the democratic framework. |
The Bill was introduced in Indian Parliament's Lower house, Lok Sabha on 17th December 2024. A division vote followed, where 269 members supported the move and 198 opposed it. The bill proposes adding Article 82A(1-6) to the Constitution to align the terms of the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, as recommended by the committee headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind.
Article 82A (1): Provides for the timeline for the President to bring into force the proposed changes on the date of the first sitting of the Lok Sabha after a general election, designating this as the "appointed date."
Article 82A (2): States that the terms of all state Assemblies elected after the appointed date and before the Lok Sabha's full term ends will conclude with the Lok Sabha's term.
Article 82A (3): Mandates the Election Commission of India (ECI) to conduct general elections to the House of the People and all Legislative Assemblies simultaneously.
Article 82A (4): Defines simultaneous elections as “general elections held for constituting the House of the People and all the Legislative Assemblies together.”
Article 82A (5): Gives the ECI the option of not holding any particular Assembly election along with the election to Lok Sabha.
Article 82A (6): States that if an Assembly election is deferred, the full term of that Assembly will also end with the full term of the Lok Sabha elected in the general election.
Amendments to Articles 83 and 172 clarify the terminology of "full term" and "unexpired term" for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, ensuring alignment with the simultaneous election framework.
Reduction in Electoral Costs: Simultaneous elections could lead to significant savings in resources like security personnel, polling staff, and election materials. The cost of Lok Sabha elections has escalated from Rs 10.5 crore in 1951-52 to Rs 50,000 crore in 2019. Streamlining processes could reduce these costs.
Continuity in Governance: Fewer elections could mitigate the "policy paralysis" caused by short-term electoral strategies and the Model Code of Conduct, reducing resource strain and allowing more focus on governance.
Minimized Disruptions: Less frequent elections would mean fewer disruptions to public life, benefiting educational institutions and reducing the burden on teachers and government officials involved in election duties.
Enhanced Voter Participation: Simultaneous elections may reduce "election fatigue," potentially leading to higher voter turnout and engagement.
Consolidated Campaigning: Political parties could benefit from concentrated campaign efforts, allowing smaller parties a better chance to compete effectively.
Economic Advantages: The Kovind Committee report indicated that India's national real GDP growth could be 1.5% points higher in the year following simultaneous elections. Fewer elections might also reduce the influx of black money and pressure on businesses for political donations.
Improved Election Oversight: The concentrated nature of simultaneous elections might facilitate better election monitoring and enhance administrative efficiency.
Implications for Federalism: Synchronizing national and state elections could overshadow local issues, favoring national parties and diminishing regional voices.
Logistical and Resource Strain: Organizing simultaneous elections would place immense strain on the resources and capabilities of the ECI and security forces. Significant investments would be required for EVMs and VVPAT machines.
Constitutional and Legal Hurdles: Implementing ONOE would necessitate significant amendments to the Constitution and Representation of People Act, 1951, potentially altering its fundamental structure.
Potential Governance Gaps: The reduced flexibility in calling early elections could result in prolonged periods of President's Rule in states where governments fall mid-term.
Reduced Political Accountability: Less frequent elections might reduce the accountability of representatives, limiting voters' opportunities to express dissatisfaction.
Operational Pressures on the ECI: The ECI would face significant pressure to conduct free and fair elections simultaneously across the country.
The concept of ONOE presents both opportunities and challenges. While it promises to streamline governance and reduce costs, it also poses significant risks to India's federal structure and political plurality. The success of this proposal hinges on careful deliberation, broad consensus, and meticulous planning to balance the benefits of simultaneous elections with the need to preserve the democratic ethos of the nation.
As the debate continues, the future of "One Nation, One Election" will depend on its ability to address these concerns while enhancing the efficiency and integrity of India's electoral process.
Explore the Judiciary Courses 2025 to access essential resources for Judiciary exam preparation, including detailed insights and strategies. Dive into the Judiciary 2025 for structured courses and focused study plans designed to help aspirants excel in their exams.